Meet the Staff: The Sketchbook
· Blog Home
· Profile
· MySpace
· Contact Us
· FAQ/TOS
Articles This Month
· Beauty Notes: How to pick and choose your blush
· Beauty Notes: Serge Lutens Iris Silver Mist
· Beauty Notes: Wishlist! (10.14.05)
· Beauty Notes: A moment of silence...
· What order...
· Beauty Notes: What order do you put on makeup?
· Beauty Notes: Serge Lutens Vetiver Oriental
· My Holy Grails volume 2: Eyeshadow
Archives
· Beauty Blog (2003-2004)
· Fashion Blog (archive)
· New Releases Blog (archive)
· Beauty Articles (archive)
· April 2005
· May 2005
· June 2005
· July 2005
· August 2005
· September 2005
· October 2005
· November 2005
· December 2005
· January 2006
· February 2006
· March 2006
· April 2006
· May 2006
· June 2006
· July 2006
· August 2006
· September 2006
· October 2006
· November 2006
· December 2006
· January 2007
· February 2007
· March 2007
· April 2007
· May 2007
· June 2007
· July 2007
· August 2007
· September 2007
· October 2007
· November 2007
· December 2007
· January 2008
· February 2008
· March 2008
· April 2008
· May 2008
Comments
· October 29, 2005 1:07 AM by
Colleen Shirazi
· October 29, 2005 1:16 AM by
Colleen Shirazi
· November 17, 2005 10:12 PM by
sherri
· October 19, 2005 11:05 PM by
Colleen Shirazi
· October 15, 2005 1:58 PM by
Dain
· October 18, 2005 8:50 PM by
Colleen Shirazi
· October 2, 2005 11:22 PM by
Dain
Recent blog posts:
Links
Barneys
refinery29
The Sartorialist
Perfume Shrine
Polyvore
The Fashioniste
The Powder Group
LA-Story.com
Dain's Literary Attempts
Colleen's Beading Blog
Colleen's Adult Acne Blog
The Beauty Blog Network
Eponym Blog Directory.
TBF Project:Blog
The Lipstick Page Forums Beauty & Fashion Blog: October 2005
Beauty Notes: How to pick and choose your blush
Posted by Dain, Wednesday, October 19, 2005 9:56 AM (Eastern)
Someone has asked me, "How do you choose the right blush?" This is a delicate question. For one thing, if you don't choose the perfect blush for yourself, most modern blushers are designed to be sheer, blendable, to (varying degrees) melt into your skin tone. But on the other hand, choosing the right shade of blush requires a deeper understanding of color theory than, say, choosing the right shade of eyeliner or foundation might. It is, in short, harder to find the right blush, but you won't be penalized very much for it.
There are two factors: skin, and contrast.
The first is obvious. The darker the skin, the stronger the color—otherwise it wouldn't show up (or, conversely, it would be too strong). So a woman with ivory-pale skin ought to look into MAC Angel (a pale pink, touched with a little beige), while someone with dark skin might NARS Sin much more to her liking (a mauvey plum pink with shimmer). So much for the INTENSITY of the blush. What about TONE/COLOR (why choose peach over plum, or mauve over pink, etc.)? It is generally a matter of contrast. Yellowish skin tones adapt better to cool colors, like pink or plum. If you have olive skin, a lovely apricot may sing your praises, but if you're darker, then a sheer orange may be gorgeous. Those with a balance of warm and cool in their skin, better termed as "neutral", can wear virtually any color, but of course complex, neutral colors like rose or mauve are good options. Those who are already quite pink, or cool undertoned, may not need to wear a blush at all. And finally, the question of PURITY of color: because there are pinks and there are pinks—there are pure colors like NARS Desire, and there are mostly-neutral-with-many-other-colors-but-pink-is-a-factor like Stila Fade. Let's say, you've decided, OK, I have light, yellow-undertoned skin, so I'm looking for a nice pink blush. Does one go for the pure pink, or the neutralized, adulterated pink? It all depends on your skin, again. If you've got very neutral skin, without very much color—a clear brown tone, ivory without any delicate blooming pink—you need more blush, more of a purer color. But if you're a ready blusher, and have plenty of pink in your skin already (which is to say, you're more closer to neutral), choose the neutralized one.
So, to recap:
- DEPTH of skin determines INTENSITY of blush
- underTONE of skin determines TONE/COLOR of blush
- NEUTRALITY of skin determines PURITY of color
The darker the skin, the darker the blush. The lighter the skin, the lighter the blush. But you can play with this by applying a blush sheer or with more intensity.
yellow: pink, plum (of a pinkish variety), rose, mauve
olive: peach, orange, apricot, terracotta, plum
pink: possibly no blush at all!
balanced/neutral: pretty much anything
blue (usually only in very dark skin): red, berry
The closer you are to a balanced skin tone, the less of a certain color (i.e. pink, or peach) you need. Choose one that is couched in a neutral base so that you don't overwhlem your features. I, however, have very little pink in my face, and therefore cling to the purer colors.
The second factor is contrast. This is a simple enough matter—we take into consideration the "context", the contrast between your skin and your other features, particularly your hair. The darker your hair, and the lighter the skin, the more vivid the blush. This makes sense, because dark hair will "bleach" the skin color somewhat, so that you need to add balance by using a stronger blush. The closer that your skin and your hair are in color—for example, a tanned skin and light brown-blonde hair—the more neutral the color should be, like an earthy rose or even a bronzer. A ivory-complected, raven-haired "Snow White" complexion, might like, however, a plummy blush, instead. What to do if you're a redhead? Few people are natural redheads, but red hair tends to compete, because it draws the eye to it. Use the most innocuous blush you can find that still gives your skin live and vigor. Peach is best, and if not, mauve or rose.
Good luck!
Labels: beauty notes, face, philosophy
Beauty Notes: Serge Lutens Iris Silver Mist
Posted by Dain, Tuesday, October 18, 2005 9:49 AM (Eastern)
At all events, I would have anticipated loving this. I love iris: I love it powdery, cold, and metallic; I love it buttery, warm, and sweet. But I do not love Iris Silver Mist. In theory, it's supposed to be: iris roots, cedar, sandalwood, incense, white amber, musk, Chinese benzoin, and balsam. To my nose, I smell carrot. Rank, rough, old, dried-out, fibrous carrot. With a bit of cedar. And lots of powder. Gross.
Labels: beauty notes, perfume, serge lutens
Beauty Notes: Wishlist! (10.14.05)
Posted by Dain, Monday, October 17, 2005 8:39 PM (Eastern)
I am full of unrequited desire these days. As if the Clé de Peau palette, fabulous as it may be, were enough! Am I, or am I not, a makeup junkie?
- Becca Amaryllis blush $25: What is it about Lucky that gets my credit card itching? They've put this under "Sold out everywhere!" (incentive enough), and describe it as "so creamy it can double as a sheer lipstick, and the flush you're left with is amazing—a rosy-cheeked, gently tipsy glow that makes everyone look prettier." What's not to love? If only it weren't, actually, sold out everywhere. Because this Sephora Gift Card is burning a hole in my pocket and I want. (I'm also curious about Wild Orchid, which is much like Desire, and Turkish Rose, which is Becca's bestseller, both featured in Allure.)
- Serge Lutens: Tubéreuse Criminelle and Vetiver Oriental. Both non-export, both glorious, I'm frankly out of my mind as to how I'm gonna get my little paws on them. One for cozy fall school days, the other for brilliant nights out (I'm gilding a pill here, but I suppose one dreams, in fragrance).
- Biotherm Smile Shine Duoshine Lipstick #129 $14: It's sheer, it's moisturizing, with no taste, no scent. The shade is a cross between MAC O and MAC Red Haute—but sheer. That's just... perfection. A holy grail, in concept, realized.
- Tod's computer bag in cognac leather $1750-1950: This is in the men's collection. The most luxurious, unbelievably gorgeous, monstrously priced schoolbag ever. Ah, well.
- Caron face powder $45: There's something tantalizing about something deemed perfection, and is only limited distribution. I've been looking for a powder, just something to apply all over for wee coverage and gorgeous skin (one hopes), but I don't like how foundation feels on my skin (and I've no use for tinted moisturizer). So, it would either be a primer (such as the ones by YSL, By Terry, Clé de Peau, Becca, Giorgio Armani, etc.) or a powder. "But which one?", I wondered. Guerlain? Gorgeous, but expensive ($135... $90-ish on ebay). T. LeClerc (too confusing, with all the shades). And then, I heard of Caron. Everything I could ask for, impeccable quality, gorgeous packaging, lovely scent, and flawless finish—call the Caron boutique at Madison Avenue, they send samples. Now if only I can figure out which color...
- Apple PowerBook G4 12-inch SuperDrive $1699: I am simply a woman who has been badly treated by Compaqs. Apples are overpriced, but they won't crash and burn. Reliability over price, I say, especially when my files are involved.
- MAC Rich Ground Fluidline $13.50: Teddy is such a great color, but not much for lasting power. Fluidlines are tenacious, so I want Rich Ground (which is supposedly identical in shade to Teddy).
- a big, bountiful, winter white sweater $138: I love the idea of this huge white thing coming at ya... and I've found the perfect one, at J.Crew, the Aran Knit Turtleneck Sweater. It's just the right, palette-cleansing, bold hit of white, but it's slim and form-fitting too, so that one doesn't get lost in the cables. I'll wear it with tweedy pants, my zebra flats, and my vintage khaki trenchcoat—classic, punchy, cool. And maybe my raspberry scarf, if the mood suits me. And warm, too, which is not my usual mode. I also love Club Monaco's lightweight v-neck sweaters, in cool jewel tones, $68 each. They're more polished than t-shirts, and infinitely easier to wear (I find the bra-antics that follow the wearing of t-shirts too difficult to follow).
- a blush brush: oy, I need a new one. I'm thinking Bobbi Brown.
Labels: beauty notes, becca, biotherm, caron, j crew, mac cosmetics, serge lutens, tod's
1 comment(s)
Post a comment (NO SPAM)
Permalink
. del.icio.us
. Stumble
|
October 19, 2005 11:05 PM, Colleen Shirazi said...
Compaq????? I wouldn't touch a Compaq with a barge pole. |
Permalink
. del.icio.us
. Stumble
Beauty Notes: A moment of silence...
Posted by Dain, Friday, October 14, 2005 4:42 PM (Eastern)
Unlike NARS shadows, NARS blushes are tenaciously molded. In other words, abuse them, and they will still not fall apart on you. My beloved Desire, a hot pink thing, has been with me for four years. And I've dropped her, many a time, but the fine-particled tightly-pressed bliss of the highest quality has never led her to chip on me (I will say, if you own one of the shimmery NARS blushes, this may be different). Alas, I drunkenly knocked into her the other night, and slammed against the floor too hard even for her faithful heart. She is dead, she is broken. God, she might have lasted me another four years. RIP, Desire.
Labels: beauty notes, face, nars
What order...
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Thursday, October 13, 2005 7:25 PM (Eastern)
Oh, stop enabling. I've been eyeing that MAC Teddy since forever. It doesn't swatch violet on me...just kind of a weird, deep cool red brown, like a dark rich copper. The perfect thing for green eyes. But, so what? I need another eye pencil? ;)
Anyhow here is the order in which I put on makeup. There are reasons for it...to whit:
- Perfume--first. Why? I keep my perfumes on my socks-and-underwear shelf. If I did not do this, I would never wear perfume. But since it's there, I put it on when I'm getting dressed, pretty much without fail.
- Usual base face. This is tinted sunscreen and MAC Blot pressed powder. Even though it is fairly obvious why this layer must come first, it is also oftentimes the only layer I manage to put on--and it's important, since a.) it is sunscreen and b.) it's powder (my skin would otherwise get oily).
- Concealer--never. I prefer that "king" of eye creams, Aramis Lab Series for Men Undereye Rescue cream, used only at night. I swear by this stuff. I don't sleep and I have two kids, I'm 40 years old...it's a miracle product, a miracle.
- Eye makeup. Lately that has been a wash of shadow, time permitting, and/or MAC Permaplum or Bordeauxline.
- Lipstick--always last. I suppose I still think in terms of a.) accidently swiping my lipstick while trying to do my eyes or b.) putting on lipstick in the car, which is, more often than not, where it gets applied.
2 comment(s)
Post a comment (NO SPAM)
Permalink
. del.icio.us
. Stumble
|
October 15, 2005 1:58 PM, Dain said...
Oh, you must get it. Swatching it on your hand means nothing--it's like the difference between a blind man and a man who sees. Yes, Teddy is simply that brilliant. You know I got Tarnish and Prunella at the same time? Haven't even touched them--returned Prunella, in fact, out of disinterest. And I haven't laid a finger on Powersurge. October 18, 2005 8:50 PM, Colleen Shirazi said...
Yehhhhhh...... |
Permalink
. del.icio.us
. Stumble
Beauty Notes: What order do you put on makeup?
Posted by Dain, Tuesday, October 11, 2005 1:11 PM (Eastern)
I'm not much of one for "faces"; I usually wear the same one every day for a season (yeah, I know! that's probably why I consider a NARS duo worth it, because it's usually the linchpin of my face). But there's a particular order to how I apply the products, and I don't really deviate, because it's somehow the "best" way.
- Biotherm Aquasource Oligo-Thermal Gel Intense Moisturization for Normal/Combination Skin $31: I love this stuff; the normal/dry version is brilliant too. It really gives intense moisturization for how little you need, and it leaves skin soft and hydrated and wonderfully textured. It smells really good, too, which is somehow a very important characteristic for me.
- Maybelline Twin Brow Pencil in Charcoal Grey ~$4: If I do brows, I like to do them early. They, in a sense, frame your face.
- undereye concealer, either Stephane Marais Perfect Concealer $39, or YSL Touche Eclat $36: Always. I do not like undereye circles. I don't usually apply anything on my face, but anything that erases tiredness is a boon for me. Sometimes I apply a little powder, if it's going to be humid out, but it doesn't do much in the way of coverage (am lusting after Caron powder, though).
- NARS Desire Blush $25: My standby, though I'd love to substitute it for Becca Amaryllis! Matches the following eye makeup better. Blush, to me, is as important as undereye concealer in making me look awake.
- MAC Teddy Eye Kohl $14: A perfect color, and I haven't looked back. Is it brown? Is it violet? It's both! And it's shimmery. It's a warm russet in the overtone, and a dark, greyed down ruddy violet in the undertone (that's like five paradoxes right there, as far as color theory is concerned). Somehow, it's brilliant. Buy it. Wear it. I sometimes layet Trish Deep Aubergine over it for some legs.
- Clé de Peau palette III $95: Actually, I'm indicating just one product, the smooth and ethereal lilac eyeshadow that I use as a wash with Teddy. They are sublimely suited to each other.
- L'Oréal Voluminous Mascara: An essential, particularly when you have Asian eyelashes to contend with!
- lip stuff: It varies.
- perfume!
Beauty Notes: Serge Lutens Vetiver Oriental
Posted by Dain, Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:34 PM (Eastern)
A perfume of contraries, even in name. "Vetiver" and "oriental" go marvelously together, but it is a complicated relationship. Vetiver, the aromatic root, is dry, cool, green, earthy—the olfactory equivalent of a dry chuckle. Though it is used extensively in feminine scents, it is usually categorized as a masculine note. Though it has a long history of Ayurvedic medicinal practice, I always think of vetiver as quintessentially French, perhaps because of Guerlain's Vetiver. It does retain a characteristic European flavour in the Serge Lutens, largely through the agency of a powdery, metallic iris (just an overlay, to accent the vetiver, not to be iris-y unto itself). But then, there is the oriental half, like a sheen of Eastern mysticism, a blurring heat that contrasts but nevertheless harmonizes with the cool sigs of the vetiver. It is simultaneously reserved and luscious, cold and hot, masculine and feminine, west and east, vetiver and oriental. In 18th-century France, a vogue for The Arabian Nights swept the literary glitterati of that nation, replacing the the tender fairy tales of Perrault and D'Aulnoy and Beaumont as the fanciful mode. Vetiver Oriental is somehow like that, a modern reader faced with The Arabian Nights in Baroque French.
There is no sense of limitedness, though, which is interestingly unBaroque. This is the Serge Lutens touch (if Guerlain had done it, it would be closed, rather than open). There's a grassy, sweet, hay-like aura—not exactly a note within the composition, but a sense of fresh air laden with meadow scents. A sweetness. Serge Lutens has taken something that is traditionally "cologne", but removed it of aggressive masculinity, and made it rather wholesome. Not a Méchant Loup (see L'Artisan Parfumeur), but the smile of a beautiful youth. Or, perhaps, a mother.
Strangely, it drives men nuts. It may work because I am very feminine in appearance and am therefore channeling a sort of androgyny, or because, as I say, Vetiver Oriental retains a wholesome sweetness and warmth that allows for femininity, or because it is mysterious and intelligent. I do not know. It's a different sort of nuts from the effect Tubéreuse Criminelle has, that's for sure. Which is to say, it smells not like lust, but comfortable, easy, nurturing, familiar... love.
Whatever the case may be, I love it. Perfect autumnal scent. Now if only I would stop falling in love with the non-export Serge Lutens! Where the hell am I supposed to find a bottle of this, pray?
UPDATE: I did eventually get a full bottle, but found it very animalic, too masculine, rather different from the sample. I gave it to my good friend Ryan, on whom it's the sexiest scent imaginable.
Labels: beauty notes, serge lutens
My Holy Grails volume 2: Eyeshadow
Posted by Raphaelle, Sunday, October 02, 2005 7:26 PM (Eastern)
I can't say there's a brand or even specific colours that have the perfect eyeshadow formula for me. I really only notice what doesn't work. Further, in my experience, no company has consistently excellent shadows. There's always at least one colour that goes on choppy, too sheer, too intense... Because of this, I'll focus on my 10 (in no particular order) favourite shadows.
1. Benefit Me, Myself & I: This colour is what the child of MAC Shroom and Brule would look like. It has shimmer but it's not obvious. It's a light beige that completely evens out my skintone. The colour is actually a lot like Bare Canvas but less peach. This colour would be a perfect base if it wasn't for its horrible staying power. In fact, the staying power is so horrible I should probably remove this from the list but I can't. The colour is too perfect.
2. Nars Himalayas: This one would probably deserve the number one spot if this list were ordered. White with cool pink opalescence, it's sheer enough to not be glaring (I had a Dior duo with an absolutely unwearable white: matte and so pigmented it looked off). It's a great highlight with almost any eye look and makes for a subtle wash. This one also holds the honour of being my most used shadow.
3. MAC Melton Mauve: I wasn't going to include this one at first. It has that lovely velvet texture that all the Veluxe shadows have but it can go on a little choppy. It's a bright matte mauve-pink, almost fuchsia, almost unwearable. If not used carefully, it could give me that "cried all night" look. Then how come I use it so much? It's because it's such a great accent colour for so many other shadows. It gives a kick to almost any neutral to cool eye look. Just a touch is enough to liven the face up.
4/5. MAC Juxt/MAC Bitter: I have to pair these two even though they're very different. Juxt is like a cool shimmery green apple. Bitter is like a bright yellow lime. The first is soft, the other glaring. They're really not alike other than I turn to these two more than any other green I've had and they both bring out hazel eyes wonderfully.
6. MAC Sable: This one isn't exactly unique. Mine broke and I've been using UD Roach instead and I suspect many other brands have this colour. A shimmery reddened medium brown, it just works. It has a richness that cooler, mauvier and greyer browns don't have. Still, it's not too warm. A perfect brown.
7. MAC Pink Papillon: Sadly a limited edition shade. This cool light shimmery pink is like candy and looks surprisingly natural and flattering on. It blends with other colours like a dream and, in the short time I've had it, has become one of my most used shadows.
8. MAC Aquadisiac: Aqua with tiny silver sparkles, it doesn't sound wearable but it is. The sparkles show up more in the pan than on the lid. The colour can be a very soft shimmery light aqua or it can be worn more with more intensity. It's one of the only Lustres that are easy to apply, not too sheer, and not too glittery. The water hue makes it good for Summer while the coolness of the colour makes it work in Winter.
9. MAC Parfait Amour: Of all my shadows, this is my favourite one to look at. It's purple with blue and indigo undertones and pink overtones. Pretty, pretty, pretty. And purple is great for hazel eyes, especially this one. It brings out the golden tones of hazel more than other colours.
10. Nars Notorious : The perfect grey. Nice medium shade, satin texture, violet undertones, it reminds me of a pigeon. It looks soft and sophisticated and just plain works.
Hey, these make a surprisingly good ensemble : a neutral base shade, versatile highlighter, two more than just basic neutrals, a kicky accent colour, and five glorious colours that mix and match with each other to perfection. I actually think I could survive with just these colours with minimal pain (I'd end up missing yellow, dark purple, blues, and medium green).
Next up: Eyeliners
1 comment(s)
Post a comment (NO SPAM)
Permalink
. del.icio.us
. Stumble
|
October 2, 2005 11:22 PM, Dain said...
Ooo... brilliant choices. I've decided I've too much of the magpie in me to ever have a "grails" list of eyeshadows, so I commend you. |
Permalink
. del.icio.us
. Stumble
subscribe
in a reader
October 29, 2005 1:07 AM,
Hmmm...that is actually pretty good advice.
I say "actually" because, it's probably the best blush advice I've ever read, or rather, the least generic. There's typically a laundry list of colors to choose from. Whether or not the colors work, well that is another story.
The problem with this advice...is not the advice. It's that it would be difficult for a makeup novice to figure out where her skin tone falls. I mean I'm putting myself in my own shoes, before I tried out so many blush colors. It took me a very long time to figure out my own skin color. It sounds...next to ludicrous...but unless you have an English rose complexion, or else a beautiful blue-black complexion, then you fall into a spectrum of rather complicated colors.
Do you think the public Internet forum is dead?
I'm not saying it's dead, I'm asking if you think it is.
I mean...I'm thinking of 1998 - 2001. Before that, I had no reason to be on the Net. In 1998, I had to construct a website from nothing and install and configure a Perl script on it. So that is when I started using the Internet.
Back then, only a relative few people had figured out how to use forum scripts. It was an entirely different group of people, than the bulk of people who now dominate public forums.
I'm tooling around on the Net tonight (I have some rather boring work to do so I'm integrating it with some time wasting :) ). It's all about "blogger communities" now. i.e. it looks like a bunch of people posting on each other's blogger comments, ah, the way I'm doing right now.
It is a public forum, isn't it? The sole difference is that you might have to click something to open up the comments.
I'm still asking myself, what happened to that original group? What happened to the people who used to post on the forums? I recognize some of them here and there, they seem to have become scattered.
Oh yeah, there's some guy called "Shirazi" posting around, doing the comments thing. lol Don't look here, that ain't me.
October 29, 2005 1:16 AM,
Ugh...maybe the final straw is that "bluefin"/"tiadesai" thread on the forums.
Bluefin and Tiadesai have the same IP address. "They" have been posting similarly for an online pharmacy on many different forums. It always ends up with an affiliate link (I checked, they pay 10% for the first sale and 8% for refills from the same customer, presumably for the rest of his or her life).
What a racket! It's not the first spam-o-rama we've had to clean off the forums.
There was the gift card thing. I checked that too, just in case there was anything to it.
Even if you don't complete the bazillion-question section, they still sell your email address to a never-ending list of spammers. I'm sure there's some fine print involved that says that if you enter your email address, you have officially sold your soul and indentured your labor, again, for the rest of your natural lifetime.
Hum. That's about it. i.e. it seems to have all boiled down to hosting spam...plus that group of stalwarts, the ones who remember the original forum format.
Will it ever return?
November 17, 2005 10:12 PM,
I am so impressed with this article. As a 25 year cosmetologist, it's nice to see advice that is not geared toward selling a specific product!
Enjoyable reading..keep up the good work!
Sherri