Notes from the Editors of The Lipstick Page Forums: A Dedication to the Art of Beauty and Fashion.

Meet the Staff: The Sketchbook

· Blog Home
· Profile
· MySpace
· Contact Us
· FAQ/TOS

Articles This Month
· Tech: New post preview feature part 2
· Fantasy Web Find of the Day: Something to Finish Off 2007
· The Library: A Clockwork Orange and Don Quixote
· Beauty Notes: Serge Lutens Bois de Violette Review
· Tech: New post preview feature
· Beauty Notes: Transitioning into "niche" perfumes
· Beauty Notes: Serge Lutens Chergui Review
· Beauty Notes: The Four Stages of Minimalism
· Beauty/Fashion/Culture Notes: The "Versus"
· Merry Christmas!
· Fashion Notes: Lucky Brand
· Culture Notes: A Star Is Born
· Three ways to stay warm this season.
· Lookbook: Snow Queen
· Fashion Notes: Why It Matters
· Beauty Notes: The Cheap Thrill
· Culture Notes: The Price of Motherhood
· Culture Notes: Pride & Prejudice
· A cool shoe site
· Closet Confidential: Lingerie
· Fashion Notes: The Caryatid Shoe
· Culture Notes: Coty lipstick & Weird Al
· Beauty Notebook DECEMBER 2007: Present Perfect
· Fashion Notes: Gryson Bags
· Present Perfect: All That She Wants
· Beauty Notes: Juicy Couture review
· Present Perfect: The Sweet Love 'tween the Moon and the Deep Blue Sea
· Fashion Notes: Cool Blog I Found
· Beauty Notes: the ever-elusive signature scent, part 2
· Beauty Notes: The Ultimate Skincare Routine
· The gift of Shu Uemura is 20% off during their Friends & Family sale event
· Another handy source of Nars and other porn...
· Present Perfect: The Sacred Nerve is Magic Poison
· The virtual model is back!
· Fashion Notes: If I didn't make jewelry, I would buy it here.
· Montale Intense Tiare review part 2
· Present Perfect: Stay Me With Flagons, Comfort Me With Apples
· Beauty & Fashion Notes: Ruminations on aging, and finding that perfect pair of pearl earrings
· NARS: The Consummate Stocking Stuffer
· Make Up For Ever: Diamonds For Ever Holiday Set
· Beauty Notes: Serenity
· Present Perfect: I Rode My Bicycle Past Your Window Last Night
· Travel: Jamaica

Archives
· Beauty Blog (2003-2004)
· Fashion Blog (archive)
· New Releases Blog (archive)
· Beauty Articles (archive)
· April 2005
· May 2005
· June 2005
· July 2005
· August 2005
· September 2005
· October 2005
· November 2005
· December 2005
· January 2006
· February 2006
· March 2006
· April 2006
· May 2006
· June 2006
· July 2006
· August 2006
· September 2006
· October 2006
· November 2006
· December 2006
· January 2007
· February 2007
· March 2007
· April 2007
· May 2007
· June 2007
· July 2007
· August 2007
· September 2007
· October 2007
· November 2007
· December 2007
· January 2008
· February 2008
· March 2008
· April 2008
· May 2008

Comments
· December 31, 2007 6:40 PM by Blogger Dain
· January 1, 2008 12:39 AM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 31, 2007 8:09 PM by Blogger LA Story
· December 31, 2007 9:07 PM by Blogger Dain
· December 31, 2007 9:33 PM by Blogger LA Story
· December 31, 2007 9:23 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 31, 2007 9:43 PM by Blogger Dain
· December 28, 2007 10:47 PM by Blogger Dain
· December 28, 2007 11:30 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 28, 2007 11:52 PM by Blogger Dain
· December 29, 2007 12:02 AM by Blogger TheBroadroom.Net
· December 29, 2007 12:06 AM by Blogger Dain
· December 29, 2007 12:19 AM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 29, 2007 12:36 AM by Blogger Dain
· December 28, 2007 2:30 PM by Blogger Dain
· December 28, 2007 11:43 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 29, 2007 12:04 AM by Blogger Dain
· December 28, 2007 12:19 AM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 28, 2007 6:13 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 28, 2007 10:55 PM by Blogger Dain
· December 26, 2007 8:58 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 27, 2007 12:31 AM by Blogger Gaia, The non-blonde
· December 28, 2007 11:46 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 26, 2007 9:17 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 22, 2007 1:49 PM by Blogger sydney
· December 26, 2007 9:03 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 21, 2007 12:49 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 21, 2007 2:27 PM by Blogger Dain
· December 20, 2007 2:22 AM by Blogger Dain
· December 20, 2007 12:40 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 15, 2007 11:20 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 15, 2007 3:25 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 15, 2007 3:38 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 15, 2007 6:32 PM by Blogger Dain
· December 15, 2007 11:28 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 9, 2007 6:53 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 8, 2007 8:53 AM by Blogger Chez Moi
· December 9, 2007 6:51 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 2, 2007 11:04 AM by Blogger Jenny B
· December 2, 2007 2:30 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 2, 2007 5:38 PM by Blogger Dain

Blog
Recent blog posts:





Links
Barneys
refinery29
The Sartorialist
Perfume Shrine
Polyvore
The Fashioniste
The Powder Group
LA-Story.com
Dain's Literary Attempts
Colleen's Beading Blog
Colleen's Adult Acne Blog

The Beauty Blog Network



Blog Directory
Add to Technorati Favorites
eponym blog directory BETA
As Seen on Delightfulblogs.com
Health Blogs - Blog Top Sites
Eponym Blog Directory.
TBF Project:Blog
Health Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory
Search For Blogs, Submit Blogs, The Ultimate Blog Directory
Find Blogs in the Blog Directory
 
The Lipstick Page Forums Beauty & Fashion Blog: December 2007


Tech: New post preview feature part 2
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Monday, December 31, 2007 5:51 PM (Eastern)

blogger screenshot


(see Tech: New post preview feature)

Okee dokee, looks like our screenshot thumbnail feature has begun to kick in. Above is a screenshot of the screenshots, which will in turn become a screenshot for the tech label, if all goes well. :)

Ideally, we would like to host the script for this ourselves, as well as the screenshot images, but using a remote service for this is currently the fastest way to implement this feature.


Labels:


2 comment(s)  
 
December 31, 2007 6:40 PM, Blogger Dain said...

Fan-fucking-tastic! Great work, Colleen!

 
January 1, 2008 12:39 AM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

Always nice to hear. :D

It seems to have a problem snapping posts with videos in them. I'll guess the snapping feature times out before the videos load...or something...it will do it, it has done it for some of the video posts. So it might be more a matter of time.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Fantasy Web Find of the Day: Something to Finish Off 2007
Posted by Dain, 4:30 PM (Eastern)

Here is a necklace from Marie-Hélène de Taillac that is both decadent and ethereal.


Labels: ,


3 comment(s)  
 
December 31, 2007 8:09 PM, Blogger LA Story said...

love LOVE LOVE!!!! that necklace. it's extremely ethereal, delicate, lacy and oh soooooooo decadent because you can tell the gems are rich..

 
December 31, 2007 9:07 PM, Blogger Dain said...

Hey, Stevie! Long time no see. Been well?

 
December 31, 2007 9:33 PM, Blogger LA Story said...

Hey Dain.. been following you a while.
You are on my facebook friends and I have thought I might ask about crossposting some of your-- and Colleen's-- blogs to my la-story.com

you have some GREAT content and I love what you said about martin margealis (spelling?)

hope you are well
Stevie

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



The Library: A Clockwork Orange and Don Quixote
Posted by Dain, 5:02 AM (Eastern)

Anthony Burgess' A Clockwork Orange is the epitome of "cult classic", both the book and the film adaptation. I have not seen the movie, though I want to, but I could easily get my hands on the book. The novel's protagonist, Alex, is fifteen, and likes violence, drugs, and rape, as well as Beethoven's 9th, all of which are made much of. It is a slim volume, which is well, because the book itself is written in a language reminiscent of Finnegan's Wake, and if you detest Joyce, as I do, the best you can say of such absurdity is, it is used to better effect than FW, because it starts to make sense after a while, as thick slang does have that mish-mashy quality. For me, the dystopic horror doesn't telegraph that well, but maybe I am too thick-skinned. There is too much elegance in Alex, and by this I do not mean his music, but he seems to have such moral sensitivity in his observations of others, and yet I have no idea why he disregards it. It seems only partially fleshed out. While there is a longstanding tradition of charismatic villains, I leave this book shrugging my shoulders. We tend to think of youth as a precious commodity—we Americans, in particular. It is, indeed, a most marketable age. But as Trey Parker (of South Park fame) has pointed out, "Kids are bastards."

Above: An image from Kubrick's film adaptation of A Clockwork Orange and Picasso's delightful sketch of Don Quixote.

Don Quixote is not a work that requires much introduction. He is contemporaneous to Shakespeare, but I am somewhat skeptical of any collusion between them. There is something about each that stands alone. They never think alone, no artist does, but the great ones, they stand alone. They share titles, however, as harbingers of modernity. Cervantes is generally credited with the first modern novel, which brings to mind such academic discussions as "What is modernity?", which like many other erudite discussions is too wrapped up in its own self-importance to notice the simple answer: modernity is the comparison of today against yesterday. When someone says, "I don't get modern art, it looks rather awful," we tell him, "It is a statement against tradition!"

When the myth-dazzled Don Quixote, after a night of bloody beatings and confused identities, concocts his rosemary-and-Ava-Maria-laced panacea, with the ever simple and ever greedy Sancho Panza looking on for secrets to sell, it is such a repulsive mixture that they both end up sick. Later, Don Quixote attacks a flock of sheep (in his mind a great Muslim army), and the shepherds stone him. Sancho Panzo worries about the state of his teeth, and the knight expounds on the importance of dentition, and asks his squire to examine his mouth. Sancho Panza sticks his head into Don Quixote's mouth, who vomits the toxic mixture from before, which disgusts Sancho Panzo so much he vomits the same on Don Quixote, and, in Cervantes' own words, "the two of them were left as splendid as pearls."

Though the text itself covers only a short space, it is quite rich, as my attempts at summary demonstrate quite clearly. So much happens and very little happens at the same time. What makes this novel such a marvel is the discrepancy between the great comedic cruelty in what happens to Don Quixote, and the sweet and melancholy tenderness in what passes through his mind. What happens when we try to live the past, not just in imagination but in reality? Under the coarse light of modern day, you have Don Quixote. In spite of the handful of centuries that separate Cervantes from the modern reader, he remains eternally fresh, because the story's premise is modernity itself: the comparison of today against yesterday.

Labels:


2 comment(s)  
 
December 31, 2007 9:23 PM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

I read A Clockwork Orange a long time ago... You can see it's utterly soaked in the Cold War mentality. I'm not sure what it would be like reading it now. It's interesting to note if its shocking futuristic quality has already kind of come and gone...where, say, 1984 still has its shocking futuristic quality (or at least the aspect of waiting for the other shoe to fall).

 
December 31, 2007 9:43 PM, Blogger Dain said...

I'll admit I did not catch onto anything Cold-War-ish , but then, my first real memory of a world event is the fall of the Berlin Wall, so I truly have a post-Cold-War mindset. But I agree that 1984 still retains that atmosphere of deadness and horror as beautifully as it did so long ago, so maybe that does not matter.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beauty Notes: Serge Lutens Bois de Violette Review
Posted by Dain, Sunday, December 30, 2007 12:34 AM (Eastern)

Every note in perfume has its own particular character, and among florals, rose is the queen, jasmine, a countess, and tuberose, perhaps, is a courtesan. Were I to continue this thin analogy further, violet would be a princess, sweet, precious, and spoiled. It was a flower beloved of Victorians, which may explain my antipathy for it. I would like to like it, just as I would like to like Dickens and Henry James, but the combination of prudery and self-righteousness (all ersatz, if you ask me, a pleasing veneer for their taste for melodrama) is overdone to my nose. Like saccharine morality, the violet has a certain sweetness to it, bound to give you a toothache in the wrong hands: Caron Aimez-Moi, for example (who else but a princess could demand such a thing?), was nausea in a bottle. Guerlain Les Meteorites is better, a little less edibility with the omission of anise and the addition of a soft white musk, the scent of a mother, in the Platonic world. I have yet to try the iconic Violettes de Toulouse.

All things considered, violets aren't "me". But Serge Lutens, master of making the character of raw notes manifest, offers one that is soothing and comforting, like a mug of fine hot chocolate, no corn syrup, thank you very much.

Dancer Adjusting Her Slipper, by Degas, of course, is a good visual similitude to Bois de Violette. The subject is a figure of much sentimental delicacy, but the awkward pose, severe outlines, and rough coloring add enough texture to make the eye linger.

It begins with the sharpness of the leaf and the aromatic touch of white cedar, the latter of which is quite reticent to my nose. In fact, I would have preferred more cedar, for it is too much the eminence grisé to the rather showy entrance of violet, a sort of effervescent sweetness not unlike... grape soda. As the perfume moves into the heart, the flower is revealed in all its modesty and purity, as if someone has turned a spotlight on it. Violet never really loses that princess-y quality. It gets moodier and sweeter as it dries down, but it remains superbly elegant throughout the whole.

Labels: ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Tech: New post preview feature
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Friday, December 28, 2007 6:06 PM (Eastern)

This blog has been around since April 2005, with us steadfastly throwing posts into it; even without going back and labeling all of the older posts (since we predate Blogger's label feature), you're still talking about what is becoming a massive number of posts.

Today I added a post-preview feature on the label-indexing pages (for example, beauty notes). It's still in the rough stages; as it stands, the feature has been implemented for all of the labels that use indexing to begin with.


Labels:


7 comment(s)  
 
December 28, 2007 10:47 PM, Blogger Dain said...

It looks great (as always), but I think you should separate the posts with plain breaks rather than lines, more in keeping with the aesthetics of the rest of the site. I really like how it shows the title and the date on one side. It's really organized in a very visual way.

Speaking of which, I really should get around to labeling my posts. I forget half the time to label the ones I do now, and have to go back and edit.

 
December 28, 2007 11:30 PM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

How about now? It's a good point, about the overall look of the site.

 
December 28, 2007 11:52 PM, Blogger Dain said...

Too close, I think. My eye is a little confused as it skips across the break from title/date to preview. But 2 might be too much? Is a 1.5 break possible?

 
December 29, 2007 12:02 AM, Blogger TheBroadroom.Net said...

It's by the pixel? (It's me btw, too lazy to log out.) I had it pad 5 pixels, now it's 7. Lmk what you think...

 
December 29, 2007 12:06 AM, Blogger Dain said...

Pixels are even better. Ah, the wondrous and infinitely customizable internet!

It still looks a little bunched up with the long titles. How about 9?

 
December 29, 2007 12:19 AM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

Now it is 9...

 
December 29, 2007 12:36 AM, Blogger Dain said...

Looks good!

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beauty Notes: Transitioning into "niche" perfumes
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, 1:14 AM (Eastern)

I would like to remind our dear readers that we have covered some of the more obscure brands of fragrance on this site, with more to come.

Perfume Reviews
The Mnemonic Sense
Perfume

You may also check individual brand labels, such as Serge Lutens, Annick Goutal, Montale and so forth.

Even as the choices in scent grow exponentially, still I would like to think we at The Lipstick Page Forums endeavor to refine...if not "what's good," at least what isn't particularly good. It's not all good. In fact that's something I always liked in Dain, that she didn't advocate indiscriminate collecting. There is a useful aspect to it, in having tried sheer masses of products, but then there is a tendency to become less perceptive of each product.

Before I go on, it's well to note I never bought any Diptyque perfume. I tried a bunch of them, but the one I liked best, Do Son, had this sort of pathetic staying power. It smelled otherworldly for about an hour; two, tops...I remember wearing it in Muir Woods, and trying to detangle what was Do Son and what was the scent of the park itself--no small potatoes, the latter looks like this:



But, eh, it's like that fantastic lipstick of the perfect shade, and zero staying power. Ultimately I won't be happy with it. I would choose a lipstick that's perhaps less in terms of the color, if it means I can put it on and forget about it, as long as possible.

Likewise, I tossed the idea of Annick Goutal's eau de toilettes. Yes, they're cute, they're easy to find, and reasonably priced, relatively speaking...the lasting power just sucks. I chased down the more elusive Annick Goutal eau de parfum and found it to last as well as any other EDP.

Etro was kind of a weird brand. I ended up with a full bottle of Heliotrope, which my kids love (always good to have a consultant or two).

Ultimately it is all about the samples: Where to get perfume samples...aedes.com, luckyscent.com, and The Perfumed Court are the more popular sites for these. Though samples can become expensive in their own right, I've found them indispensable particularly for niche fragrances, because these tend to not be designed to smell good sprayed on a card, or tested on your hand in a department store. There is often a far less immediate appeal...some scents take hours to develop, days to comprehend, and months to be able to afford. :D

Anyhow, happy hunting! and do check back on this blog.

image courtesy Wikimedia Commons

Labels: ,


3 comment(s)  
 
December 28, 2007 2:30 PM, Blogger Dain said...

I've heard that the Chanel exclusifs are very good, but of course, they are a mass-market brand's version of niche. I haven't smelled any of them, but talented perfumers and highest quality ingredients sounds like a promising mix. Guerlain is very tricky for me, Guerlinade is musty on me, but I do like L'Heure Bleue. If I had a house, it would be Caron. Caron never cheapens.

You know, Annick Goutals have never agreed with me? They are somehow... too cute, too benign. I think I prefer perfumes very strong opinions. Diptyque, I've only tried two, one was a big hit, the other a big miss. ETRO has very wearable, but unoriginal perfumes, I think. Serge Lutens, I think, gives you a real appreciation for raw materials--those two really know how to bring out a flavor, it's never the thing itself, but in a lot of ways, it is often better. I'm dead curious about Montale--I guess we'll see!

 
December 28, 2007 11:43 PM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

The odd thing is it's probably harder to get hold of a Chanel "secret perfume"--dunno, do they keep it behind the counter? :D than a plain old niche fragrance. The niche people were smart enough to start up sample programs, which go hand-in-hand with decant services.

I've never had Guerlain work on me...have never tried Caron. Givenchy is my "mainstream house," since I'm allergic to the older, better Chanels.

Annick Goutal is weirder than Etro if you think about it. Etro, overall, struck me as masculine, where AG struck me as feminine--but wildly differing. Not all of their scents are nice-girl concoctions. It's as if someone goes crazy in the lab late at night, and pops out something no one else has, that is too perfect. And then it's business as usual the next day.

Lutens...mmmmm...I suspect he's more your guy than mine. You're more European in taste than I am. Montale to me has this slight French edge, but it's largely Middle Eastern in flavor. I sense SL is largely French with a slight Middle Eastern edge. (I could be entirely washed up here, it's more of a hunch.)

 
December 29, 2007 12:04 AM, Blogger Dain said...

Yeah, Guerlains are just tough, but very rich food for the mind. I guess that will just have to be my next perfume review. ; )

To be honest, there are only a very sparing number of SLs I'd consider FBW, indeed Tubereuse Criminelle is alone assured. They are magnificent to appreciate, as one might savor fine wine in a restaurant, but it is quite another thing to buy a case of the vintage (approximately the relationship between decant and full-bottle, no?).

However, I see what you mean, and I think your hunch is a good one. It is very French. But you know, Fleurs d'Oranger is one of the least impressive of the SLs, pretty but... And I have never tried Montale. We'll just have to see.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beauty Notes: Serge Lutens Chergui Review
Posted by Dain, Thursday, December 27, 2007 8:55 PM (Eastern)

It is time I actually review these samples I obtained so long ago. I am looking for woodsy/spicey/exotic scents, and Serge Lutens is as rich a vein to mine as any.

Most perfumes in production today are urban scents, otiose confections that telegraph everything about the wearer: personality, age, income, and sexual availability. Pastoral medleys are a pleasing alternative, but often these ambient perfumes seem rough and unfinished. Chergui, however, is all polish and intelligence.

Breugel's The Fall of Icarus has famously inspired many an ekphrastic, but I will make the venture that it suits Serge Lutens equally well.

In this latter work, Bruegel's adaptation of Bosch's combinatorial demonic is not so apparent, but the allseeing omniscience (only available to artists) remains: the distortion of perspective is positively sardonic. "Everything turns away/ Quite leisurely from the disaster", the world and its humbler inhabitants loom large, while the titular character is only a pair of white legs thrashing in the surf.

Likewise, Serge Lutens has taken highly atmospheric hay, and added a sort of boozy abstraction, a sludge of mixed spices and honey. It is not the dry and herbaceous raw material of Parfumerie Générale Bois Blond, which draws refinement from the addition of sandalwood. Chergui is the country gentleman's library, not the country itself. The pure aromatics of the woods and fields might float in on a breeze, but the gentleman is immersed in his book and his mulled wine, closer to civilization than even he realizes.

Unbridled magnificence, but I'd like something drier.

Labels: ,


1 comment(s)  
 
December 28, 2007 12:19 AM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

Hay...reminds me of Annick Goutal's Eau du Ciel. It's not listed as a hay scent, particularly, yet it has this odd sunny feel to it.

I want to say it reminds me of this specific incident where I was playing hide-and-seek with my sister and cousins, on my grandparents' organic farm. I was hiding behind what, to me, was this towering flower. Years later I saw the same section of the garden and it all seemed so...short.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beauty Notes: The Four Stages of Minimalism
Posted by Dain, 4:57 AM (Eastern)

One night, I had taken too many amphetamines—not a common occurrence, mind, one of those youthful indiscretions—and in that queer frantic frenzy (you are a bit like a piranha on speed), I spoke to God. Now, I am Buddhist by upbringing, so this was highly unlikely, but an immense pressure laid me prostrate and choking, and I felt rather than heard the following: "Why do you not believe in me?" None of Schopenhauer's bitter philosophies rose to mind; why fight philosophy with philosophy? I told him, "There are many of those who claim belief without living it as it were as truth, which is belief itself. You of all know that in matters spiritual that appearances matter least." And he agreed with me, because the pressure that threatened to crush me suddenly lifted.

I have a certain perverse antipathy towards all normative modes of thought, belief, and of course, shopping—including my own. Minimalism is not for everyone. I like people who think for themselves, who are more inclined to disagree than agree, and admit that the greatest absurdity of all is some paradisaical belief in human perfection. It is just, I take offense at the notion that I can make up for my faults with material objects, where "the things you own end up owning you". Some are necessary for practical matters of form, such as a well-cut suit for work, and others for the enjoyment of life, such as a significant piece of jewelry, and all else is "shit you don't need." (Both quotes from Fight Club.) In times when consumer drive has more power than the right to vote, minimalism is a queer philosophy, hinging on the rarest of maxims: I have enough. Three little words, so difficult to say. Not surprisingly, it requires much patience, and in fact hones your taste and discernment to a greater degree than mere accumulation.

There are four stages: (1) casting about not knowing what you like, (2) an accumulation in which there are standouts and surplus, (3) the deliberate process of tweaking and keeping an eye out, and occasionally being struck by lightning, (4) nirvana.


Here is where I stand:
    Makeup: 4. It might experience a bit of tweaking here and there, and NARS Duos are always welcome, but it is quite a settled thing: undereye concealer and vibrant rosy blush, brow pencil, ultrablack mascara and inner-rim definition, dusky sable eyeliner, three shadows (fleshtone shimmer, ethereal lilac, moody sea blue), three lipcolors (burnished raspberry, luscious berry, dramatic red). Oh, and a great powder compact, for touch-ups. Most beauty junkies admit to hundreds of lipsticks and eyeshadows, but I often find the flavor of boastfulness in such "confessions". These women have no intention of curbing their habits, in fact, it is proof of their "expertise" and "taste". I have fourteen products. Fourteen. Each product must meet exceptionally exact specifications, and if that does not refine your taste, I do not know what will.

    Skincare: 3 ½ A bit premature to declare 4 (I should wait till a year rolls by to be absolutely certain of its fitness), but it is close: Lancôme Bi-Facil, Primavera Refining Exfoliating Cleanser, Jurlique Herbal Recovery Cream, Embryolisse Lait-Crème Concentré. The heart of this routine is very simple and pure, the Primavera cleanser and the Jurlique treatment, and though softer, brighter skin is apparent from the first, the effects are cumulative. What you end up with is healthy, normal skin. This is hardly a poetic description, but it is exactly what skincare should do, for when the skin is normal and healthy, it takes care of itself. Of course, my skin tends to be dry, and I wear makeup, so some additions are necessary.

    Hair: 4 By default, because I'll admit, as long as I have Phyto 7, which I go through as other women do mascara, it does not matter. It keeps the parched ends of my long, dry hair silky soft, and again, the effects are cumulative. I prefer basic products that smell good—a shampoo that does not strip, a conditioner that moisturizes—I daresay I'll return to Nature's Gate. I tried the CO Wash, but I just... don't like the way cheap conditioners smell.

    Closet: 3 I have more to say about this, but it is an ongoing project, chronicled in greater detail in Closet Confidential. The ultimate goal is to fit my entire wardrobe in one generous piece of luggage, an ambitious project, to be sure, but I think I'll live. It requires very careful consideration, though, so it has progressed slowly thus far.

    Perfume: 2 Pathetic, I need to work on this, though I have begun the process of paring down what I have gathered heedlessly from ebay and the occasional press kit. Thankfully, The Perfumed Court has graciously allowed me to sample a few of their myriad offerings, and the interview and reviews shall be forthcoming, in the ongoing series, The Mnemonic Sense.

Labels: , ,


2 comment(s)  
 
December 28, 2007 6:13 PM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

It'll sound odd, but I've also found sea blue eyeshadow essential. I suppose most people immediately picture Mimi from The Drew Carey Show...but the modern sea blue shadow is as subtle as some neutral shadows, without the crushing boredom factor.

 
December 28, 2007 10:55 PM, Blogger Dain said...

That is funny... But it is logical, when you think about it. Could there be a color less like skin than blue? It's the perfect contrast.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beauty/Fashion/Culture Notes: The "Versus"
Posted by Dain, Wednesday, December 26, 2007 5:55 AM (Eastern)

I hope everyone had an excellent holiday, though I'll be glad when sport-shopping calms down; I've been afraid to go to the stores since Thanksgiving. Today's post will be of a light and frivolous nature, to ease us back.

Soap vs. Body Wash
The inspiration for this post came when I was last showering, and I dropped my soap, bent down to pick it up, and banged my head on the wall, nicked my back on the faucet, and bruised a shoulder on the soap dish. "Perhaps," I thought to myself, "shower gels are the better idea." But I love a wonderfully creamy, fragrant soap: I still remember my grandma's bathroom, there was a wall stocked with hundreds (so I thought) of soaps, in every hue and cry. And I hate loofahs and sponges and poofs and mitts... I think they're disgusting. Still, when it comes to portability and sheer variety of scents, shower gels cannot be beat (in particular, I love Korres). The final say? I may buy shower gels, but I will use soaps.

Lipstick vs. Lipgloss
Oh, this one is no contest. Lipstick all the way! I've been sick of gloss since 2005, though I'll admit my favorite lipcolor is a gloss, albeit a pigment-rich, low-luster gloss, more akin to a "sheer/lustre" lipstick than a vinyl shine. Lipstick is not as forgiving as gloss (you cannot err as much with color choice), but when a woman wears real lipstick really well, it has much more profound impact.

Heels vs. Flats
I suppose if I had to make a choice at gunpoint, it would be heels—I am that sort of girl. But it is a tricky call when there are such beautiful examples on either side. Really, I just want more Manolos, once you own a pair, I fear there is no going back. They are such transcendent joy, frankly I know few physical experiences that are capable of this: twilight, wild raspberries and Torrontes, a few lines of Shakespeare, very good head (enough said), a shower after too much travel, the creaky leathery-dusty scent of a library, Jimi Hendrix, greasy and crisp fried chicken with honey mustard for sauce, Michelangelo. Manolos belong to this list.

Beer vs. Wine
Though I mentioned Torrontes (shown above), I actually favor red wines for their lush flavor, in particular chianti, syrah, and the rougher malbec. But I do enjoy a good Belgian ales (Leffe, Chimay) from time to time. I'd be very hard pressed to choose, they have different moods. I am also the rare equal opportunist when it comes to tea vs. coffee—I drink both! Hm... I think I'll back out of this particular debate gracefully with an aromatic gin and tonic.

Blonde vs. Brunette
I hardly think it matters when one is very beautiful and has the sort of presence that ices out all other women in the room.

In fact, this is all very silly. Binaries imply that one is better than the other, but who cares, so long as one's taste is refined?

Labels: , , , ,


3 comment(s)  
 
December 26, 2007 8:58 PM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

1.) soap
2.) lipstick
3.) some heel is good...prefer low heels to flats or high heels
4.) beer
5.) both...for women I don't think it matters. But I prefer dark hair for men.

 
December 27, 2007 12:31 AM, Blogger Gaia, The non-blonde said...

1)gel (I'm way too neurotic about germs. Everything I use needs to be bottled and sealed)
2)both, please. And preferably Chanel.
3)heels. always heels.
4)Champagne
5)Personally, I think Elizabethe Taylor was prettier. But both are just what I loved when it comes to good old glamour.

Here's to our refined tastes :)

 
December 28, 2007 11:46 PM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

Hi! waves I like your blog btw.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Merry Christmas!
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Tuesday, December 25, 2007 7:36 PM (Eastern)


all i want for christmas is you - mariah carey



Darlene Love - Christmas (Baby please come home)



Labels:


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Fashion Notes: Lucky Brand
Posted by Dain, Sunday, December 23, 2007 11:07 PM (Eastern)

Though the company is best known for its jeans, I really like their offerings as a whole. They have a certain bohemian casual cool well in hand, and the items are well-made but not expensive, like a West-Coast J. Crew. They do not have a high-turnover rate, but I always find one or two things I really like every season (I have two of their dresses). Below, a concise selection that caught my eye.

Floral Wrap Cardigan ($118)

Fur Hoodie Lined Parka ($178)

Hendrix Tie Dye Scarf ($28)


Peacock Earring ($38)


Artisan Tote Bag ($188)

Labels: ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Culture Notes: A Star Is Born
Posted by Dain, 7:53 PM (Eastern)

Truly, the internet is a wonderful place. I've been watching classic movies uploaded by leslie04film on Youtube. The faces! The clothes! The witty dialogue!

Now, this version of A Star Is Born was released in 1954. This means two things. One, it is not weird that it is a musical, today it is a practically a genre for effete audiences only (like tourists to Broadway), not for "serious films". Two, though it meditates unflinchingly on the dark side of celebrity, it is not as dark as it could be. The first is a golden opportunity for Garland's golden voice, and if it is a little silly at times, the film pokes fun at it. I particularly enjoyed this number, early on in the film when she's just scraping by, perhaps because I'm real fond of jazz (not that a jazz singer would so diva-like):
Garland seems chubby and plainfaced by the Hollywood standard (for the rest of us, she is still a very attractive woman). The film makes fun of this too: the infamous "makeover" scene where the artistes fuss over her troublesome nostrils, and Mason fails to recognize her, and laughs when he realizes who it is, all based on Garland's real-life experiences. Garland plays up her androgyny, with a boyishly short cut and equally gamine costumes, her only womanly feature on display are her perfect dancer's legs.

But what makes the film really striking is its exploration of celebrity, which is perhaps why this film has been remade so many times. So long as film endures, so will the issues it brings to the table. The troubles of the unknown, the sheer machinery aspect of Hollywood, the pressures of publicity, and the deep, deep dependency on fame. There is one really terrible scene when Garland is leaving a funeral and a fan screams at her and rips her veil off.

At first, I intended this article to present the flavor of contrition. I felt ashamed that I bitch about celebrities. I don't know these people. Why are they fair game? I would not like people to pass judgment on me in such a manner.

But then, I thought, I am not a celebrity. In fact, I can think of nothing more horrifying than a whole lot of people looking at me. Hollywood is the myth-making instinct of humanity turned into a business. It is not that celebrities are "not people", but they sought public attention on a grand scale, a goal so very, very difficult to obtain that it cannot be anything but deliberate. I've heard many a time that Paris Hilton (the only celebrity I truly despise) is a nice girl, that people give her a hard time, but those who would seek attention should be prepared for negative attention, or quit it as Dave Chappelle did. People who value privacy first and foremost do not seek to be a public figure. If you are lucky enough to attain the fulfillment of your desires and do not, as did Macbeth, find them to your liking, that is not other people's fault. For chrissakes, I don't care about your problems; entertainers are not victims of society, by my book.

Labels: , ,


1 comment(s)  
 
December 26, 2007 9:17 PM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

Yeah, I dunno...the idea of putting celebrity "news" where the real news should be, is relatively new.

I mean there has been Hollywood gossip since there was a Hollywood, but the idea of Britney Spears being news, reminds me of 1984--where they created a fake person to plug into the holes left by the real person who had just fallen out of favor.

Since we gave up our Fairness Doctrine, it seems to me this is what gets plugged into the holes left by there not being any coverage of the opposing view.

In that regard...it's hard for me to take it seriously one way or the other. Celebrities were not that important back when we had the Fairness Doctrine.

Sometimes I do sense some of them are crying all the way to the bank, that they embody the notion that bad publicity is better than none at all. That they'r