|
Notes from the Editors of The Lipstick Page Forums: A Dedication to the Art of Beauty and Fashion.
Meet the Staff: The Sketchbook · Blog Home · Profile · MySpace · Contact Us · FAQ/TOS Older Articles · Most Wanted: Age of Innocence · Culture Notes: A Bit of a Rant · Beauty Notes: Hermès Hiris Review · Fashion Notes: Charlize Theron on the Cover of W · Closet Confidential: Lingerie & Loungewear · Fashion Looks: Indie Jewelry · Closet Confidential: Restart · Beauty Notes: Fantasy NARS Palette · Just Notes: This, that and the other 1 · Beauty Notes: Ormonde Jayne Ormonde Woman Review Comments · May 17, 2008 3:08 PM by Colleen Shirazi · May 17, 2008 4:49 PM by Dain Archives · Beauty Blog (2003-2004) · Fashion Blog (archive) · New Releases Blog (archive) · Beauty Articles (archive) · April 2005 · May 2005 · June 2005 · July 2005 · August 2005 · September 2005 · October 2005 · November 2005 · December 2005 · January 2006 · February 2006 · March 2006 · April 2006 · May 2006 · June 2006 · July 2006 · August 2006 · September 2006 · October 2006 · November 2006 · December 2006 · January 2007 · February 2007 · March 2007 · April 2007 · May 2007 · June 2007 · July 2007 · August 2007 · September 2007 · October 2007 · November 2007 · December 2007 · January 2008 · February 2008 · March 2008 · April 2008 · May 2008 · June 2008 · July 2008
Recent blog posts:
Links Barneys refinery29 The Sartorialist Jargol Perfume Shrine Ambre Gris Polyvore The Fashioniste The Powder Group LA-Story.com Dain's Literary Attempts Colleen's Beading Blog Colleen's Adult Acne Blog The Beauty Blog Network
Eponym Blog Directory. TBF Project:Blog
|
Posted by Dain, Saturday, May 17, 2008 12:14 AM (Eastern) I am sometimes taken aback by the exquisite cruelty of No. 19. Perfumes are like people, or, to be more specific, like potential mates: the majority are blandly nice, some are charming teases (popular but without depth), and a few are downright repellent. As in life, truly exceptional perfumes are rare; who can explain why we love? You'll have to forgive the revisitation, but, along with Tabac Blond from the house of Caron and Mitsouko from the house of Guerlain, No. 19 is one of those rare individuals. If pressed, I'd wager that each is the very best offering from these revered houses, though not necessarily the most iconic or wearable iterations. The basis of my reasoning is rather obscure, as they smell rather unlike (in spite of the chypre connection): I find them utterly dignified. They may not allure from the first—indeed, most people find them somewhat difficult "to get to know", and it must be admitted I cannot pull off Tabac Blond—but it takes depth and complexity in a character to hold you fast in fascination for all life. It is rather like when you meet someone who is supremely confident. They don't need to impress, you'll come back, and if you are too insipid to realize what you have seen, it is you who are the poorer. No. 19 makes me feel slightly gauche and uncertain; I never feel like I completely understand what she means. Like any exceptional perfume, you'll not perceive all its facets from a haphazard dab on the wrist. Like Henri Robert's other great contribution to Chanel (Cristalle), it has a sort of brittle reserve that distinguishes it from many a lushly self-indulgent banality. By 1970, aldehydic florals were surely par for the course, thanks to No. 19's more glamorous cousin No. 5, but here Robert takes the house signature and spins it into hyperbole. Aldehydes are more textural abstraction than naturalistic aromatic, so the effect, with chlorine galbanum as reinforcement, feels rather like wandering a subterranean garden cut from crystal (do you hope to pluck this dusky jewel?). For me, the drama tends to vacillate between salty-soprano white rose and peppery-earthy iris, while lily of the valley runs through the composition like a river of mercury, before pooling into the subtly leathery vetiver base. If you're looking for rooty, metallic iris par excellence, the EDT is an excellent place to start, but I personally prefer the parfum, in which the delicacy and the crucial structural elements (iris, galbanum, aldehydes) are maintained, but the floral bouquet is richer and more pronounced—I still think of it as a rose perfume. Death by poison. To wear No. 19 is to sally forth to battle. And to take no prisoners. Labels: beauty notes, chanel, perfume reviews |
|
May 17, 2008 3:08 PM,
He wrote that song for a black woman...the "dusky jewel."
Chanel is pretty good, I wish I could wear their stuff without developing a rash. mumbles...
May 17, 2008 4:49 PM,
I do tend to think of Hitchcock blondes when it comes to No. 19, but someone like Naomi Campbell would definitely give them all a run for their money, so it probably still works. : )
Aww... I forgot about your Chanel allergy! I thought you might enjoy this one, especially since you like No. 5 and the AG Heure Exquise.
Post a comment (NO SPAM)
Links to this post:
Create a Link