Notes from the Editors of The Lipstick Page Forums: A Dedication to the Art of Beauty and Fashion.

Meet the Staff: The Sketchbook

· Blog Home
· Profile
· MySpace
· Contact Us
· FAQ/TOS

On This Page
· Beauty Notes: Desert Island Stash (Part 2)
· Beauty Notes: Desert Island Stash (part 1)
· Fashion Notes: Shoe Advice from Bruno Frisoni
· Beauty Notes: The Four Stages of Minimalism
· Closet Confidential: Introduction
· Fashion Notes: Dain's hyperconsumerism commentary
· Beauty Notes: Katie Holmes' Stash
· Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Stash
· Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Hair
· Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Eye (wash)
· Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Eye (depth)
· Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Eye (define)
· Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Lip
· Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Face
· Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Skin Care
· Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Eye (lashes)
· Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Eye (brows)
· Beauty Notes: A Guide to Minimalism (politicized rant)
· Beauty Notes: In Her Bag
· A Return to Minimalsim: An Update
· A Return to Minimalism: Conclusion
· A Return to Minimalism: Part 4
· A Return to Minimalism: Part 3
· Minimalist thoughts
· A Return to Minimalism: Part 2
· A Return to Minimalism: Part 1
· A Return to Minimalism: Introduction
· Beauty Notes: A Guide to Minimalism (The Philosophy)

Comments
· March 25, 2008 5:09 PM by Blogger Peach
· March 25, 2008 5:21 PM by Blogger Dain
· March 27, 2008 7:31 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· March 9, 2008 12:53 AM by Blogger ~Joy~
· March 9, 2008 4:36 AM by Blogger Dain
· March 4, 2008 5:30 PM by Blogger Fashionatta
· March 4, 2008 5:47 PM by Blogger Dain
· December 28, 2007 6:13 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· December 28, 2007 10:55 PM by Blogger Dain
· November 2, 2007 2:47 PM by Blogger Dain
· November 3, 2007 1:36 AM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· November 3, 2007 1:37 AM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· August 9, 2007 3:31 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· August 8, 2007 1:33 AM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· August 8, 2007 11:45 AM by Blogger cmm
· August 7, 2007 4:36 AM by Blogger Audrey_H
· August 7, 2007 7:13 AM by Blogger Dain
· August 6, 2007 3:09 PM by Blogger Audrey_H
· August 7, 2007 1:49 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· August 4, 2007 2:45 AM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· August 4, 2007 3:12 AM by Blogger Dain
· August 3, 2007 10:29 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· August 3, 2007 10:45 PM by Blogger Dain
· August 3, 2007 11:49 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· August 4, 2007 12:20 AM by Blogger Dain
· August 4, 2007 12:39 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· July 31, 2007 6:32 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· July 28, 2007 1:41 AM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· July 28, 2007 10:02 AM by Blogger Audrey_H
· July 29, 2007 12:12 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi

Archives
· Beauty Blog (2003-2004)
· Fashion Blog (archive)
· New Releases Blog (archive)
· Beauty Articles (archive)
· April 2005
· May 2005
· June 2005
· July 2005
· August 2005
· September 2005
· October 2005
· November 2005
· December 2005
· January 2006
· February 2006
· March 2006
· April 2006
· May 2006
· June 2006
· July 2006
· August 2006
· September 2006
· October 2006
· November 2006
· December 2006
· January 2007
· February 2007
· March 2007
· April 2007
· May 2007
· June 2007
· July 2007
· August 2007
· September 2007
· October 2007
· November 2007
· December 2007
· January 2008
· February 2008
· March 2008
· April 2008
· May 2008
· June 2008
· July 2008

Blog
Recent blog posts:





Links
Barneys
refinery29
The Sartorialist
Jargol
Perfume Shrine
Ambre Gris
Polyvore
The Fashioniste
The Powder Group
LA-Story.com
Dain's Literary Attempts
Colleen's Beading Blog
Colleen's Adult Acne Blog

The Beauty Blog Network



Blog Directory
Add to Technorati Favorites
eponym blog directory BETA
As Seen on Delightfulblogs.com
Health Blogs - Blog Top Sites
Eponym Blog Directory.
TBF Project:Blog
Health Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory
Search For Blogs, Submit Blogs, The Ultimate Blog Directory
Find Blogs in the Blog Directory
 
The Lipstick Page Forums Beauty & Fashion Blog


Beauty Notes: Desert Island Stash (Part 2)
Posted by Dain, Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:38 PM (Eastern)

Confused by the advice of print-magazine hacks and the onslaught of new releases, each more essential than the last? Here is a list of ten products that are truly essential, even if you are a fan of those bi-monthly MAC collections, for a very simple reason: they flatter the face but stop short of being obvious. Since not even I could live on ten products alone, I've split it into grooming and decorative, and chose two images that have a common theme. If you can guess the connection between the image below and the La Perla ad from before (I'll give a hint, it's not black and white), I'll send along a free prize.

Angelina Jolie in St. John's spring 2008 ad campaign.
  1. UNDEREYE CONCEALER
    Even if you have flawless skin, chances are, you've got a bit of darkness along the inner corner of your eye, and everyone, practically everyone, looks just a little more refreshed with a little concealer. It's a subtle difference that makes a big difference. Choose one that is creamy enough to blend easily, so you needn't waste time blending and tugging at delicate eye skin (and use your ring finger, it applies the least force), but isn't so greasy it "settles" into fine lines or slips off by the end of the day. Look for one that is just slightly lighter than your skin tone, with yellow undertones if your undereye circles are blue, peachy if they are brownish.
  2. THE BLUSH ABSOLUTE PRINCIPLE
    This is really important: find yourself a shade of blush that is perfect. You could wear any ole brown shadow or pink lipstick, but this is one color that is worth the trials and tribulations of the Holy-Grail quest. It makes you look fresh and healthy in a really indefinable but holistic way, and if you find the right shade of blush, you really don't need another. When you don't have time, you can just slap it on in 15 seconds and look presentable. I have written a more comprehensive guide to choosing the right blush, which you may peruse at your leisure.
  3. THE YLBB, or, Your Lips But Better
    A lipcolor that is slightly richer than your natural lip tone is arguably the easiest and most perfect cosmetic. If you have trouble finding one, you can always look to your blush for reference; chances are, a color that matches or intensifies that perfect shade of blush will work equally well on the lips. It is a color you can always depend on to be appropriate for all occasions.
  4. DEFINING THE LASHLINE
    It may be a swipe of mascara or a smudgy bit of eyeliner, or both. Techniques range from the subtle (tightlining) to the dramatic (liquid liner). You may prefer a traditional eyeliner, or just mascara, but my favorite method is to find the the creamiest, inkiest black eye pencil to smoosh at the base of the lashes on the inner rim, which creates the optical illusion of thick lashes, and a coat or two of equally black mascara. Sometimes I add a mink-brown kohl for a bit of smolder, or a fleshtone shimmer wash to provide some neutral contrast against the black, but these are all thematically related—emphasis on the lashline.
  5. DON'T NEGLECT YOUR BROWS
    Everyone's needs differ, but a good set of brows is crucial. They give balance to the structure of the face. A symmetrical face may seem off if the brows are not well placed.
  6. PRETTY EYE SHADOW
    I think every woman needs at least one colorful eyeshadow, something a little adventurous that makes her eyes really pop. Not strong, vivid color, something relatively subdued but still not quite neutral. On blue eyes, I think a pinkish-copper metallic is especially striking, on green, a soft mauve is always reliable, on brown, I think olives (if you are warm) and lavenders (if you are cool) are excellent choices, but of course there is more than one possibility.
  7. DRAMATIC LIP
    You can go dark and bright, with a red, a plum, even magenta or coral, or if you cannot pull off a bold lip, you can always try the passive-aggressive approach, with a nude. I find that the best accent to a dramatic lip is a wash of some subdued, eye-popping color (see above), so these two go hand in hand.
  8. CONTRAST EYE
    How do you wear an unnatural color? Not a halfway color like lilac or red, but one that only occurs on the skin of aliens. The answer is: surprisingly easily. A direct contrast, usually a color that's right opposite your perfect shade of blush, is strangely flattering, more so than a slightly mismatched neutral. The contrast to coral and peach? Lime and emerald. The contrast to pinks and reds? Blues, teals, and suchlike. A plum? Try silver frost. If you're still dubious, wear it as eyeliner only.
  9. TOOLS OF THE TRADE
    I highly recommend Shu Uemura's Compact Brush Set ($55). It is an incredible deal and the quality is the best you can buy. It is missing a few things—an eyeliner brush, tweezers, eyelash curler—but is otherwise perfect for most of your needs.
  10. EUPHORIC FRAGRANCE
    You should have at least one perfume that you wholeheartedly adore, one that sends you straight into ecstasies, and one you can turn to when you know not what else to wear.
Ok, I cheat a little, but it was the only way to make the list universally applicable. It's not intended to be limiting; by all means, if there is more you desire, bring it along. But this is stuff that I really believe everyone could make use of, regardless of your needs.

Anyway, here are mine:
  1. Clé de Peau Concealer
  2. Good Skin Pink Lotus Blush (NARS Desire would do as well)
  3. NARS Gothika Lip Gloss
  4. Too Faced Liquid Lava Extreme Black Gloss & L'Oréal Carbon Black Voluminous Mascara
  5. Kevyn Aucoin The Precision Brow Pencil
  6. Chanel Lilas Soft Touch Eye Shadow & MAC Teddy Eye Kohl
  7. Shu Uemura Rouge Unlimited #270
  8. L'Oréal HIP Sassy Eye Duo
  9. Shu Uemura Compact Brush Set
  10. Guerlain Mitsouko

Labels: , ,


3 comment(s)  
 
March 25, 2008 5:09 PM, Blogger Peach said...

It looks like the bathroom that both women are in are similar....am I close?

 
March 25, 2008 5:21 PM, Blogger Dain said...

Wow, excellent. Yes, they're both bathroom sinks. A beauty junkie's hub. ; )

Send me your address, my email is just dain.choi@gmail.com!

 
March 27, 2008 7:31 PM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

Peach: congrats!

As far as desert island stuff, there is also a poll on the forum: Poll: Desert Island Picks

I dorked it up though, I forgot MAC Blot powder.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beauty Notes: Desert Island Stash (part 1)
Posted by Dain, Saturday, March 08, 2008 6:46 PM (Eastern)

In the days of yore when only some people (nerds) used the internet, there was this frequent poll that would surface now and again on the beauty boards: Desert Island Picks, top ten essential products. It should come as no surprise to you that I especially delighted in these polls, the kernel for what would later become minimalism. Several years later, this is perhaps as concrete a guide to a minimalist stash as I can command. 'Ware, in the true idiom of Desert Island, I will spare the corporate brainwashing (I'm not selling anything, after all), and stick to bare necessities*.

La Perla spring 2008 ad. My first reaction
when I saw this: what's in those bottles?

I could never live on ten products alone, so I've split it into grooming and decorative cosmetics. To start off with, skin and hair.
                  If you already have good skin, here is all you need:
  1. a gentle, effective cleanser
    It should rinse off cleanly, removing dirt, oil, and makeup (the effective part), but without leaving an oily film, or alternatively, stripping (the gentle part). Additionally, if it exfoliates a little, so much the better.

  2. a no-frills, penetrating but fast-absorbing moisturizer
    The plainer the better; the instinct for miracle creams is well mined by the industry, but they are absolutely nonsensical. La Mer, in fact, is quite a heavy but plain moisturizer (in spite of what they say about it). Unless you have very oily or very dry skin, a good moisturizer should not sit atop the skin like an occlusive layer (that signifies that it is too rich for you) nor should it leave the skin taut and tight (not rich enough).

  3. a mild exfoliant
    Though I find my cleanser adequate in this respect, find yourself a good scrub, acid-laced serum, vitamin c treatment, mask or whatever and use it one to three times a week. It is necessary maintenance: rids flakes and dullness, and keep clogged pores at bay.

  4. obligatory sunscreen mention
    Though I don't touch the stuff, I hate how it feels.

  5.               If you wear moderate to heavy eye makeup:
  6. add makeup remover
    It should remove all traces of makeup in an instant. Unless your eye makeup removes easily with your normal cleanser, then don't waste your elbow grease by tugging at such delicate skin. However, if you use an oil or balm cleanser, this may not be necessary.

  7.               If your skin varies with the seasons:
  8. find yourself a "treatment" that hydrates without weight
    One you can wear without discomfort in sultry summer humidity, and when winter comes, layers easily under your regular moisturizer for an extra boost of moisture; two light layers are more hydrating than one heavy cream. It may be a traditional watery gel/serum/essence or an aromatic face oil, only take care to eschew silicones if possible, which impart a nice texture but crowd out the beneficial and more expensive ingredients (silicones are the liars of the cosmetic world). If you have oily skin, this might do as your moisturizer.

  9.               If you have problem skin:
  10. here you bring out the treatments
    Dark circles and scarring? Hydroquinine and licorice extract are common treatments. Puffy eyes? An eye gel, preferably cooled, may help, as will reduced sodium in your diet. Shine? I've heard (my skin has never been very oily) that certain oils, contrary to reason, are very helpful. Acne? Salicylic acid, benzyl peroxide, tea tree oil, clays, calendula extract, camphor, sulfur, vitamin c, various alpha hydroxies, etc., depending on the type and extent of the affliction. Dull, flakey skin? A gentle exfoliant, vitamin C, and a good moisturizer. Sensitivity? Aloe vera, cortisone, and calendula extract are traditional. Aging? Get over it. You'll just look older worrying about it.

  11.               And what about... eye cream? toner? masks?
    Marketing gimmicks. Eye creams are usually similar stuff to the corresponding face cream, with richer emollients and textures, thrown into a smaller jar and labeled with a steeper price. Unless you have specific issues you wish to treat, your normal moisturizer will do just as well. Toners were once necessary in that age-old three-step routine, sandwiched between greasy cleanser that did not rinse off well and an equally unctuous moisturizer, to strip away that first for the second. Nowadays, there are many cleansers that perform their duties without leaving any residue behind, leaving toners high and dry. After all, back then, we did not know that sunscreens were so vital, either. And masks are all about the unnecessary step, the extra feel of treating yourself well, if they suit you, then by all means, use one.
So what do I use? Primavera Gentle Cleansing Fluid (cleanser/very lightly purifying), Jurlique Herbal Recovery Gel (toner cum lightweight hydrator cum multivitamin treatment), whichever moisturizer I am trying to use up, and Lancôme Bi-Facil (eye makeup remover). Bath and body is even simpler, I don't really care for those kind of products: Bisous de Provence soaps from Trader Joe's and Palmer's Cocoa Butter Lotion (fragrance-free).

As for hair, only one product is a necessity for me: PHYTO Phyto 7, a sort of leave-in cream. My hair is very dry, but otherwise totally non-maintenance, and no conditioner I have tried works to soften the rough edges, because the stuff rinses off. Nevertheless, I like Nature's Gate Herbal Hair Conditioner. Unlike most conditoners, which load up on silicones to give you that rich, slippery feel, it feels disappointingly watery, and yet is actually deeply hydrating. And I love the smell. As for shampoos, ehhh, PHYTO Phytonectar is probably my favorite, orange blossoms exploding in the shower and so very gentle, but it is rather too expensive in the States. I don't style my hair.

Nine products, hm... What am I missing? Ah! Lip balm. Dr. Hauschka is my favorite, but I'm gonna try Weleda Everon as a substitute.

* It frustrates me to see women buying into, and not just buying, so much crap. I think it of the utmost important that a girl learn to think for herself, and after that, to keep her own counsel. Even in this so-called enlightened age of female emancipation, we are always primarily understood by our impact on others. The shallow, initial impressions, whether or not we are thin and beautiful and young, take a decided precedence, though this is not to imply that men are not judged by their appearances. If you are not perfect, shell out your money! Does this make any sense?

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,


2 comment(s)  
 
March 9, 2008 12:53 AM, Blogger ~Joy~ said...

The bottles in the pic look like hotel toiletries to me.

 
March 9, 2008 4:36 AM, Blogger Dain said...

You are very likely right. They must have done the photo shoot in a hotel!

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Fashion Notes: Shoe Advice from Bruno Frisoni
Posted by Dain, Tuesday, March 04, 2008 3:25 PM (Eastern)

Long before the flame-colored sole of the "Loub" was the obligatory status symbol for every starlet and wannabe starlet, there was Roger Vivier, who in 1954 collaborated with the ultimate master of fantasy, Christian Dior, in creating the stiletto heel. Nowadays, the label is under the helm of Bruno Frisoni, whose idiom is somewhat more avant garde, but he is no less devoted to the upper echelon of artisanal luxury: bags made of posh fur or Indian tribal beads, ultraviolet crocodile, sandals that froth with handmade lace or silk rosettes, heels that resemble vines with thorns or meticulously covered in feathers. It's stuff so fantastical that one wonders if they are intended for wear at all. Below is an example of Frisoni's work for the house, based on some vintage Dior prints:
All things considered, it is a relatively tame, relatively commercial offering, some of these shoes are seriously abstract. Most of the shoes are quite outside of my comprehension. It isn't merely an immediate response of "wow, what an intensely beautiful shoe", I'm sitting here thinking, "OK, someone actually molded those petals by hand, it is actually sculpture". That is, as they say, too rich for my blood.

Somewhat to my delight, Frisoni has been interviewed in the March Allure, and he is a minimalist! And I quote:
    Imagine the impossible: If you could own only four pairs of shoes—or even only two—Frisoni offers this shopping list.

    Indispensable Shoe: Glamour Pumps Look for "pumps with a nice décolleté" (meaning toe cleavage) and a ten-centimeter (approximately four-inch) stiletto heel. "Those are killer shoes for allure and sexiness," Frisoni says.

    Indispensable Shoe: Ballerina Flats They're "cool and young" and can be worn for everyday with short skirts or trousers. These, with the pumps, "are the two extremes that always work."

    Optional Shoe: Boots Or booties with a substantial heel. These are "for walking in a skirt or trousers."

    Optional Shoe: "Very sexy sandals" In other words, sandals with a very high heel. Frisoni's prescription for wearing them: parties, dinners, and the theater.
Four inches is a whimsical height for me, but otherwise this is almost word for word my shoe collection—as it exists, not in my head, but sitting on my bedroom floor. Glamour pumps with décolleté? Check. Ballerina flats for everyday? Check. Boots for walking? Check. Very sexy sandals? Check. The first two, and Frisoni is so dead right about this, are quotidian standbys, for a very simple reason: chic really goes with everything. After that, what do you need? Something practical and sturdy for inclement weather (the boots) and something festive and frivolous for special occasions (the sandals). I'd add a fifth pair, flat sandals for the summer, since you can't wear heels to the beach.

Labels: , , ,


2 comment(s)  
 
March 4, 2008 5:30 PM, Blogger Fashionatta said...

I know I shouldn't say it but I can't help loving the shoes in the picture;-)

Julie
Mio Destino

 
March 4, 2008 5:47 PM, Blogger Dain said...

I think they're great, equivalent to couture, only that they're beyond my price range.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beauty Notes: The Four Stages of Minimalism
Posted by Dain, Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:57 AM (Eastern)

One night, I had taken too many amphetamines—not a common occurrence, mind, one of those youthful indiscretions—and in that queer frantic frenzy (you are a bit like a piranha on speed), I spoke to God. Now, I am Buddhist by upbringing, so this was highly unlikely, but an immense pressure laid me prostrate and choking, and I felt rather than heard the following: "Why do you not believe in me?" None of Schopenhauer's bitter philosophies rose to mind; why fight philosophy with philosophy? I told him, "There are many of those who claim belief without living it as it were as truth, which is belief itself. You of all know that in matters spiritual that appearances matter least." And he agreed with me, because the pressure that threatened to crush me suddenly lifted.

I have a certain perverse antipathy towards all normative modes of thought, belief, and of course, shopping—including my own. Minimalism is not for everyone. I like people who think for themselves, who are more inclined to disagree than agree, and admit that the greatest absurdity of all is some paradisaical belief in human perfection. It is just, I take offense at the notion that I can make up for my faults with material objects, where "the things you own end up owning you". Some are necessary for practical matters of form, such as a well-cut suit for work, and others for the enjoyment of life, such as a significant piece of jewelry, and all else is "shit you don't need." (Both quotes from Fight Club.) In times when consumer drive has more power than the right to vote, minimalism is a queer philosophy, hinging on the rarest of maxims: I have enough. Three little words, so difficult to say. Not surprisingly, it requires much patience, and in fact hones your taste and discernment to a greater degree than mere accumulation.

There are four stages: (1) casting about not knowing what you like, (2) an accumulation in which there are standouts and surplus, (3) the deliberate process of tweaking and keeping an eye out, and occasionally being struck by lightning, (4) nirvana.


Here is where I stand:
    Makeup: 4. It might experience a bit of tweaking here and there, and NARS Duos are always welcome, but it is quite a settled thing: undereye concealer and vibrant rosy blush, brow pencil, ultrablack mascara and inner-rim definition, dusky sable eyeliner, three shadows (fleshtone shimmer, ethereal lilac, moody sea blue), three lipcolors (burnished raspberry, luscious berry, dramatic red). Oh, and a great powder compact, for touch-ups. Most beauty junkies admit to hundreds of lipsticks and eyeshadows, but I often find the flavor of boastfulness in such "confessions". These women have no intention of curbing their habits, in fact, it is proof of their "expertise" and "taste". I have fourteen products. Fourteen. Each product must meet exceptionally exact specifications, and if that does not refine your taste, I do not know what will.

    Skincare: 3 ½ A bit premature to declare 4 (I should wait till a year rolls by to be absolutely certain of its fitness), but it is close: Lancôme Bi-Facil, Primavera Refining Exfoliating Cleanser, Jurlique Herbal Recovery Cream, Embryolisse Lait-Crème Concentré. The heart of this routine is very simple and pure, the Primavera cleanser and the Jurlique treatment, and though softer, brighter skin is apparent from the first, the effects are cumulative. What you end up with is healthy, normal skin. This is hardly a poetic description, but it is exactly what skincare should do, for when the skin is normal and healthy, it takes care of itself. Of course, my skin tends to be dry, and I wear makeup, so some additions are necessary.

    Hair: 4 By default, because I'll admit, as long as I have Phyto 7, which I go through as other women do mascara, it does not matter. It keeps the parched ends of my long, dry hair silky soft, and again, the effects are cumulative. I prefer basic products that smell good—a shampoo that does not strip, a conditioner that moisturizes—I daresay I'll return to Nature's Gate. I tried the CO Wash, but I just... don't like the way cheap conditioners smell.

    Closet: 3 I have more to say about this, but it is an ongoing project, chronicled in greater detail in Closet Confidential. The ultimate goal is to fit my entire wardrobe in one generous piece of luggage, an ambitious project, to be sure, but I think I'll live. It requires very careful consideration, though, so it has progressed slowly thus far.

    Perfume: 2 Pathetic, I need to work on this, though I have begun the process of paring down what I have gathered heedlessly from ebay and the occasional press kit. Thankfully, The Perfumed Court has graciously allowed me to sample a few of their myriad offerings, and the interview and reviews shall be forthcoming, in the ongoing series, The Mnemonic Sense.

Labels: , ,


2 comment(s)  
 
December 28, 2007 6:13 PM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

It'll sound odd, but I've also found sea blue eyeshadow essential. I suppose most people immediately picture Mimi from The Drew Carey Show...but the modern sea blue shadow is as subtle as some neutral shadows, without the crushing boredom factor.

 
December 28, 2007 10:55 PM, Blogger Dain said...

That is funny... But it is logical, when you think about it. Could there be a color less like skin than blue? It's the perfect contrast.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Closet Confidential: Introduction
Posted by Dain, Monday, November 12, 2007 1:43 AM (Eastern)

From the general to the specific. Now that my stash is well in hand, it seems natural to put my closet in order. Neither my taste nor my approach may suit you, but as I've said before, style is a sort of controlled display of eccentricity, and for better or for worse, this is personal. Here is the mission statement: a wardrobe so intensely minimal that it will fit in a single (but generous) piece of luggage, but impeccably chosen for seamless mixing and matching, yet is completely expressive. A high order, but why not?

I think a great deal on why women shop and how women wear things. So much of what one reads, in print and on the internet, extorts the things themselves, which is wonderful for inspiration but useless in practice. There will be small doses of fantasy here and there, but for the most part this will be a real-life experiment. As such, it will follow the vagaries of my own taste rather than a systematic "I need this" approach. It might take years before I can [afford to] gather everything together, but once it's done, it's done. I need only replace. Though there are some women who execute an immense closet masterfully, so many others struggle with an overflow of very little style. I really believe that there is a discrepancy between the clothes we wear and the clothes we buy: a sort of functional redundancy. Who hasn't felt the fleeting joy of an unnecessary acquisition? Self-control is so dull. And yet, if you never buy anything that inspires lukewarm feelings but rather genuine adoration, even if it is as simple as "this black t-shirt has the perfect fit!", you will never feel the lack. As your eye sharpens, so will your wardrobe, pared down to the beautiful things you love.

You may worry, "Won't it look a little odd, wearing the same things all the time?" No. No one cares. If you are well dressed, you are well dressed. If someone gives you crap, they need to get a life.

First purchase, American Apparel Nylon Weekender Duffle Bag ($32):
Love the color, unusual enough to leap out from the carousel, yet light enough to fold away into nothing. My only critique: luggage should always have at least one pocket (for separating dirty underwear). Its dimensions (25 1/2" x 12 3/8") will provide a realistic lower limit. I think I'll leave shoes and underwear out the reckoning however.

Labels: , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Fashion Notes: Dain's hyperconsumerism commentary
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Thursday, November 01, 2007 11:52 PM (Eastern)

I quite agree with the minimalist concept, of narrowing down your wardrobe...much the way we have been narrowing down beauty routines, which was Dain's concept to begin with. I'd say I've been far less organized about the fashion aspect of my own life; I've seen it more as a matter of what you do. From what you do, you tailor your wardrobe around that.

Back when I worked in offices, I had ton loads of office clothes. It didn't bother me. You always need something to wear to the office. At one point I had enough office clothes and I stopped buying them. I still have these clothes...office attire doesn't actually change much from year to year, or even decade to decade, as long as what you have fit well in the first place.

I mean I'll go to a fashion forum and people there will spend their time dissing, say, stockings. Apparently it's the faux pas of the millennium to wear stockings (this may be a West Coast thing) but I don't care. My legs look good in stockings...stockings are conservative...I've pretty much figured out how to keep the darn things from running...et cetera. No need to change the stockings routine. A couple of years from now, women will be wearing stockings as if nothing had ever happened anyway.

Shoes...I will actually need some shoes, some time. My office shoes are on their (bad pun warning) last legs. They still look nice, but they're getting a tad worn-looking. I hate shopping for shoes (I hate shopping anyway) and I don't wear heels. I need one pair of good-looking office shoes with a low heel.

So that's it for office wear, for me...I would probably go back and see what still fits, and fill in the blanks with something along the lines of machine washable dresses. Most of my old office clothes are dryclean only; it costs a fortune and uses chemicals.

Casual clothes...I've had to wear these for the past eight years or so. I have a lot of them. It's more along the lines of khaki or olive green pants, fitted tee shirts...stuff that isn't going to go out of style. If I had bought a lot of low-rise pants with flared bottoms, I'd be screwed, but again I agree with Dain. A moderately low rise and bootcut sort of bottom always work. You can always throw in something stovepipe-y if you've got the legs for it (I don't so that's outta there).

Fitted tee shirts...sort of happy with the Mossimo ones. If Banana Republic still made the kind of tee shirts they used to, I'd buy those, but they don't. I still have one, here it is in 2004, back when I still wore jeans:

banana republic tee shirt

The shirt was already a few years old if I recall correctly, and it's only now starting to show signs of wear. I've worn and washed it a bazillion times.

I started making jewelry at one point, it's hard...there was a burst of interest in it (no doubt coinciding with a burst of layoffs), but I've found the newer suppliers tend to sell materials only at a certain level. If you want better supplies, you have to go through refineries, which means going through the Patriot Act, which is annoying. I suspect the suppliers who stay in the game will eventually sell a higher level of supplies, if only because the people who stay in the jewelry-making business will want to buy them, but that will probably be a few years from now.

That's already covered the main aspects of my life. I can't really dress up doing the mom thing, it wouldn't make sense in any sense, but I've never espoused dressing badly as a mom. That wouldn't make sense to me either.

Labels: ,


3 comment(s)  
 
November 2, 2007 2:47 PM, Blogger Dain said...

I just don't want to be bothered any more. I'm so sick of the current attitude towards fashion and beauty: the halfwit celebrities, the ecstatic editorialists, the glut of useless products. No one's forcing me to take part, of course, and I'm sure it'll pass, but I am just disgusted.

 
November 3, 2007 1:36 AM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

Well, some things have changed...we got rid of our Fairness Doctrine. We deregulated the number of advertising minutes per hour on tv. I think it was 13 minutes per hour before, now there is no limit.

The regulations themselves may have been relatively new, but the media have become more omnipresent. i.e., if you turn on a tv, you are inundated with advertising, 24/7. If you turn on a radio, it's less jammed with ads, but then the content is controlled by a single corporation; the content itself is a sort of subliminal ad.

The Net is still there...I hate to be pessimistic about it. I keep thinking it's inevitable the Net will go the way of all other media preceding it. But is it inevitable? You still need geeks to run things. Geeks have never been all about the money (they can't be, since a lot of what they do doesn't pay relative to the time involved).

I'm not sure if it's harder to watch this scene if you remember pre-Reagan America too well. Maybe it's easier, since you then feel that things can change, that this is all a sort of phase.

 
November 3, 2007 1:37 AM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

In any case, I've always thought your minimalist philosophy was a good one.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beauty Notes: Katie Holmes' Stash
Posted by Dain, Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:46 AM (Eastern)

From August 1999, Seventeen. I apologize for the blurriness of the image, but I can't upload a file more than 100K. You're not really missing out, it's just copy.

This is from a time when Katie Holmes was Joey Potter, the of-the-moment America's sweetheart, seriously 1999. Tom Cruise was still married to Nicole Kidman, the superior actress in looks and talent (better actor than Cruise himself, IMO, but currently sporting way too much plastic surgery), but perhaps less tractable than the current Mrs. Cruise. You can tell it's 1999. For one, a mini backpack. For another, the unerring self-confidence of the fleetingly successful starlet, unlike the hounded expression she tends to habituate nowadays.

I don't read Seventeen any more (I read one once a year ago at the dentist's, it was appallingly bad; I'd like to say I've grown, but I don't think it was really that bad), but I've kept this article all these years. Why? I like minimalism!

One of the things that really peeves me is slavishness regarding cosmetics (i.e. every single print magazine currently being published), and by this I mean, "this product is awesome!", and "this product is a slightly different awesome!", and "omigod! this product is awesome!", and "this is the newest awesome product!"*. I may be a snob, but greed is no substitute for taste, and stupidity is offensive.

Oh wait, was that unAmerican of me?

Hold up, let me rephrase: stupidity is an unalienable right, and people with educated opinions are elitists. Let's all be awesome with awesome products riding the tide of awesomeness together! Because that is exactly how the world is.

Which is why I kept this, to remind me always what it is like to own only what you require and the stray product for a frolic, and not, for god's sake, everything that expense spares. Man, it's a hobby, not a lifestyle.

Here are the products listed:

1. Dr. Hauschka Facial Toner
2. Maybelline Great Lash Waterproof Mascara
3. Kiehl's Creme with Silk Groom
4. Kiehl's Lip Balm #1
5. Bulgari Eau Parfumée au Thé Vert
6. Bumble & Bumble Simply, Shampoo (discontinued)
7. Dr. Hauschka Cleansing Cream
8. Bobbi Brown Bronzing Stick
9. Stila Twilight Eye Shadow
10. Bumble & Bumble Deeep Conditioner
11. MAC W15 Pressed Powder

Industry staples, for the most part. This was somewhat before the [usually makeup artist] brand explosion became mainstream.

*Let us suppose, for example, that one were saying such things about a person. What nicknames would result? Flatterer, sycophant, toady, parasite, minion, leech, brown-noser, bootlicker, HACK, tool, flunky... Why in heaven's name would you get like that about an inanimate object? Ok, that's it. I shut it up now.

Labels: ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Stash
Posted by Dain, Thursday, August 09, 2007 12:07 AM (Eastern)


Above: On the left, an everyday look, naturally pretty but polished, rosy blush and lips, subtle definition on eyes with a defined brow (similar to mine). On the right, full-on glamour with red lips AND smoky eyes, though personally I just wear one or the other.

Here's what I've written thus far, so all the articles are together, philosophy and in-depth guides:
A Guide to Minimalism (The Philosophy)
A Guide to Minimalism (A Politicized Rant)
The Minimalist Skin
The Minimalist Face
The Minimalist Lip
The Minimalist Eye (brows)
The Minimalist Eye (lashes)
The Minimalist Eye (define)
The Minimalist Eye (depth)
The Minimalist Eye (wash)
The Minimalist Hair

The first trick to minimalism, as I outline in the first article listed above, is founded on two basic principles, perfection and complexity, in order to ensure maximum versatility (the more versatile a product, the more uses it has, therefore reducing the number of products you need). The second trick (which is expressed in greater detail in the second article), is a question of need: examine well your blood*. Consider the reasons why you buy products, whether it is out of insecurity, the pleasures of novelty, or simple compulsion. I'd be the first to say that shopping should be fun, not serious; after all, many of my holy grails have been impulse buys, while others still make feeble first impressions but earn their place in my stash—you can't plan this stuff out, really, it's more a matter of experimentation. However, if you have a problem with overshopping and hoarding, or are simply sick of too much crap, then it's good to learn how to become a smart shopper, rather than a compulsive one.

The third trick is what I wish to explain in this conclusion (about time! I'm ready to move onto something new!). And this is a holistic matter, i.e. the sum total of the individual products working together, however complex they may be on their own (explained in the subsequent articles). A pretentious term for it might be, the synergy of a stash. This is important because products are static, while stashes are dynamic, and thus reflect the owner's personality. The synergy of a stash is even more important to a minimalist, because when you have fewer products, it is particularly essential that they work together well.

Let me explain how this works. Skincare works together; your cleanser, your exfoliant, your sunscreen, your moisturizer, and whatever treatments, all come together to improve your skin. Your skincare regimen works in combination with face products, for obvious reasons, as the better your skin, the fewer products you need. Among face products, your perfect blush will be your guide to choosing lipcolors (though when it comes to application, you should apply your blush last to make sure you don't overdo it). When it comes to a "look", the colors and methods you choose must work together, i.e. a smoky eye will demand muted blush and lips, while red lips will pair with subtle effects like highlighter as blush and tightlining. Specfic looks will determine specific color products, and vice versa. And of course, the products you use will determine the tools you need. Within a stash, the products support and complement each other—ultimately, this is what I mean by synergy.

And so, here is mine:

SKIN
I have sensitive skin that breaks out rarely, though I have some clogged pores (minimal, though). It is normal in the summer, humidity will make it somewhat oily, but in the dead of winter it is rough and parched. I wear eye makeup that can be somewhat difficult to remove, because of inner rim lining, so instead of risking damage to the delicate skin around the eyes, I have decided to make eye makeup remover a part of my regular routine. Cetaphil Gentle Skin Cleanser is my tried and true cleanser. I've not had any success finding a good exfoliant that doesn't do horrible things to my skin, so I think I may just stick to a time-tested Korean trick, a viscose cloth ($0.99 for two, and it lasts longer than any product). I hate how sunscreens feel, so I don't wear any, which is very bad, but can't be helped, I'm picky. Likewise, I'm too picky to have found my holy grail moisturizer yet, though I've found any number of good ones. For summer, I prefer Jurlique Herbal Recovery Gel alone for its subtle brightening, healthifying effects, but it will make a great breathable night cream in the winter under Burt's Bees Repair Serum. As far as treatments are concerned, extreme dryness and sensitivity are the major concern, for which Burt's Bees Repair Serum is excellent (it also doubles as eye cream).

FACE
I take very good care of my skin, so I need little extra help in this area. For most days, Stephane Marais Perfect Concealer and NARS Sin are perfectly adequate. They're the small improvements that make a huge difference; they make me look fresh. My only complaints are that I'll have to replace my undereye concealer with the much more expensive Clé de Peau, and I wish Sin were a smidgen less strong (less shimmer would be great, too—sparkly blush is silly). When I want more polish, I don't wear foundation or tinted moisturizer (which feel heavier, and subdue the glow natural to skin) but powder, Caron Poudre Peau Fine, which adds light to the face and very subtly blurs imperfections. As a blush alternative for red lips (berry blush is too strong), I use a fleshy shimmer shadow to give a glow to the skin (no need for an extra product). A blush brush is required, I'm thinking of investing in Shu Uemura.

LIPS
This is perhaps where my fine talk about complexity and versatility best comes into play: NARS Gothika Lip Gloss, a rich, sophisticated burnished rose with berry undertones (it is a grown up version of my first favorite lipcolor, Loco Cocoa). It's got similar tones to my perfect blush, so it's automatically flattering and ever appropriate. It dresses up, dresses down, matches everything, doesn't matter. It is true that there are many other flattering shades, but I've realized that they pale in comparison to Gothika, and if that's the case, why bother? There's one situation that Gothika fails to cover, and that is the queen of lipsticks, red. For that, I adore Giorgio Armani Armanisilk #46 Bordeaux. Hey, and lip balm, Dr. Hauschka.

EYES
Kevyn Aucoin The Precision Brow and Tweezerman Slant takes care of brows. A fleshy shimmer is essential, and mine is the silvered peachy-champagne of NARS All About Eve, though I'd rather find a single of this shade (I don't use the other). This is easily paired with tightlining, I'm thinking MAC Blacktrack Fluidline, which makes lashes look lush and dense, plus L'Oréal Carbon Black Voluminous Mascara. These are both "natural" (not makeupy) techniques for every day, but they make my dark eyes glow. As a rule, I favor minimal eye makeup, at least in appearance; in practice, it's a bit of a routine. If I desire more definition, MAC Teddy Eye Kohl is gorgeous and easy to wear: a smoky line turns that glow into a fire. If I wish for depth, I trade All About Eve for the pretty pewter of Shu Uemura ME Brown 850, and for an ethereal, fairy-like look, I alternate a soft lilac, like Chanel Lavande Soft Touch. I need the following tools: Shu Uemura Eyelash Curler, Tweezerman Slant Tweezers, Shu Uemura 13G Natural Brush, NARS Push Eyelining Brush, and Kevyn Aucoin Small Eyeshadow Flat Tip Brush.

My "everyday face"—undereye concealer, rose-plum blush, rose-plum lipcolor, fleshy highlight, tightlining in black and black mascara, defined brows—is easily modified. All I have to do is add a smudge of kohl here or switch in a colorful shadow there. I don't experiment much, so this much variation satisfies me. When I wear red lipstick (and this is what I mean by a product that determines a look), I change in the fleshy highlight as blush and alternate the pewter for some depth. When I want smoky eyes (and this is what I mean by a look that determines the products), it's a complex layering of All About Eve, as highlight, ME Brown 850, to soften liner and add depth, and MAC Blacktrack Fluidline, as regular liner this time, smudged a bit, with minimal lips and cheeks (highlight and lip balm, or Gothika really sheer). I also intend to keep NARS Cleo and MAC Powersurge Eye Kohl, for the rare occasion that I get bored with these looks.

*A Midsummer Night's Dream, Act 1 Scene 1, I think, Theseus to Hermia.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


1 comment(s)  
 
August 9, 2007 3:31 PM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

Actually that makes sense--the synergy of the stash. It's not unlike the concept of building a wardrobe, having the pieces mix and match. More is not always more.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Hair
Posted by Dain, Wednesday, August 08, 2007 12:11 AM (Eastern)



All told, I am not an expert on hair. I don't do much with mine: I cut it myself, I don't color or perm or straighten it, I don't blowdry, I don't style, I haven't changed my hairstyle in years, I don't own a hairbrush, I rarely wear it down, even. Really pathetic, for a beauty junkie. It's good hair, so I leave it alone. That's pretty much my hair philosophy: bucketloads of conditioner, and, leave it alone. It's not the sort of hair that styles well anyway.

The trick to minimalist hair is learning to be content with its nature. It's one thing to seek endlessly for a perfect red lipstick, but I find it tedious to wrangle it into submission. It doesn't surprise me that there are women who'll spend $300 for a haircut and two hours every day styling it (I am having nightmares of Texas bouffants, at this point), but I find that there's a sort of zen-like simplicity in tending to it as it naturally exists.

I treat my hair as if it's very expensive, delicate clothing. Just as textiles deteriorate, so does hair (it's all dead stuff). Just as you might launder expensive delicates and fine cashmere with the utmost care, I try to treat my hair as gently as I can. I use a very, very gentle shampoo, PHYTO Phytonectar, which is so nourishing you can leave it in for a couple minutes for extra conditioning, and tons of conditioner. I'm frustrated with finding a cheap conditioner that's rich enough (my problem with expensive conditioners is that I use too much too quickly); Feria makes a good one, but I don't have access to a Sally's, and an olive oil treatment is effective but too messy for everyday. I shampoo as usual, then apply conditioner to the ends and let it soak in the hot shower for a bit. I don't detangle, because hair is really weak when wet (if you must, use a wide tooth comb, and work your way bit by bit from the ends to the roots—Mason Pearson makes a worthy detangling comb). That's pretty much it. When my hair is damp, I leave a bit of hair oil at the ends to protect them from further damage and add a wee bit of definition.

I'm going to try using a lighter weight conditioner as shampoo AND conditioner. I don't really know the exact name of this method (Carol explained it a long time ago), but while it seems counterintuitive to use conditioner to cleanse, it actually makes a lot of sense for long, dry hair. Just as one with dry skin might use a cleansing milk instead of a foaming gel, so might one use a conditioner to cleanse. After all, a conditioner rinses off, and it's got a oil-water base rather than a detergent base, just like a cleansing milk. It strikes me as the gentlest way to cleanse your hair. I wonder if one can use two conditioners for this purpose: a lighter one to cleanse, and a richer, more emollient one (like Nature's Gate Herbal Hair Conditioner, which is misleadingly watery; it's the heaviest conditioner I've tried, in spite of how creamy more recent formulations may feel) at the ends. I dunno, will need to play with this strategy more. I'm tired of looking for conditioners that invariably fail, and I dislike silicones, which are everywhere.

When it comes to haircuts, I cut my own hair. I have sideswept bangs, which are fairly easy to maintain with monthly trims (I make vertical cuts, that's pretty much it, at bang length my hair is pin straight so it's simple), and about once a year my hair gets too heavy for me to carry (I have a rather lot of hair) and I lop it all off. When my hair gets long, it has a slight wave to it, so if I cut my hair using graduated cuts rather than blunt cuts, it grows very satisfactorily into a naturally tousled mane. It looks a lot better than the fake Gisele hair you'd get from a salon, because the hair grows into it rather than cut to resemble like it grew that way. I've had the same haircut for years. It will probably remain for the forseeable future. It flatters, works with my hair's natural texture, and it's supremely easy (and cheap) to maintain.

I have dyed my hair for a long time. I finally came to the conclusion that my natural black, which thankfully does not require highlights, is really the most elegant shade of all. It's also quite rare in nature. Black is hard to replicate with dyes. As a result, my hair has been healthier for it. That said, however, I think many people benefit from some color enhancement, though not all. A richer color, or subtle well-placed highlights, can go a long way in enhancing your look, but take care not to deviate too far from your natural hair color; it's the rare person who can pull it off.

Now, to styling. The easiest way to keep your products to a minimum, and your routine simple, is to work with, not against, your hair's natural texture. It will also reduce the damage done to your hair, and healthy hair is much more attractive than the best style (maintenance over treatment, again). I advise avoiding blowdryers and heat styling, though that may draw screams of rage from devoted votresses to hair rituals. Use a cool setting, if you must (it also enhances shine). With straight hair, I find that a hair cream applied to the ends to tame flyaways is all I ever need, though I usually don't even bother. With wavy hair, scrunch a lightweight gel like Dove Define and Shine while the hair is still damp, for sexy, tousled hair. Curly hair should avoid blowdryers at all costs—I have no idea what kind of curl enhancer is good. I also have no idea what to do with fine, flat hair, perhaps mousse. As for African hair, personally, I like it natural, and find overprocessing disappointingly fake. For special occasions, I use a big hair clip for a basic French twist.

Overall, minimalist hair depends on making it as pretty AND healthy as possible, so you've got to find the minimum of damaging techniques that make your hair look good easily and naturally. Just as good skin obviates the need for foundation, the quality of hair dictates how much you need to style it.

PRODUCT COUNT: Hopefully, one, a good conditioner that works as both shampoo and conditioner and even perhaps as a leave-in.

Labels: , , , , ,


2 comment(s)  
 
August 8, 2007 1:33 AM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

That is entirely weird...this thing ate my comment. Oh well.

I was going to recommend this site:

http://www.naturallycurly.com

It's great for curly hair, obviously, but they also detail the "conditioner only" hair cleansing method Carol mentioned. It might well work for you, since your hair is long and dry.

Plus there are product recs all over the place...stuff developed specifically for curly hair, which also tends to be dry (since the curl keeps scalp oil from travelling the length of the hair).

I have that flat thin annoying hair myself, it's a waste of time trying to boost it up with mousse, blowdrying etc.

I've had much better luck with my biotin supplement. My hair is longer than it's been in years...before taking the supplement, I would have had to cut it by now, otherwise it would have been way stringy. As it is, it actually looks okay past my shoulders now. :)

Aside from that, less is more for hair on the thin flat annoying side. More products=more weight on hair. I wash my hair every day (it's a must, I don't care what anyone says, I tried washing less frequently back in the 1970's and it never worked for me). But a mild natural shampoo works better than an astringent one. I condition only on the ends of my hair (whatever falls below my ears).

A nice quote from the Sweetpeacurli site...it came to mind as I was reading your post:

As Jessica McGuinty (creator of jessicurl) says, "Treat your hair with at LEAST the same respect as you treat your fine silk shirt."

 
August 8, 2007 11:45 AM, Blogger cmm said...

the long hair forums are THE place to go to learn how to care for long (and I do mean loooooong) hair.

http://forums.longhaircommunity.com/

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beauty Notes: The Minimalist Eye (wash)
Posted by Dain, Tuesday, August 07, 2007 1:55 AM (Eastern)

Above: The NARS Spring 2007 look, put together by neimanmarcus.com. It's a colorful variation on the wash, using two shades, but all the better to show technique. The purple shade is a traditional wash, the golden shade an inner corner highlight.

To finish, the wash, which is usually a lighter shade, or at least a colorful one. It is the simplest technique of all, a "wash" of shadow on the lid, usually sheer, using a big, fluffy eyeshadow brush (I favor Shu Uemura 13G), but there are more precise variations which I include here because these are all techniques that add light and color, rather than shadows and depth. These are: highlighting the brow bone (this will make the arch of the brow more pronounced, and seem to "lift" the eye, which is useful if you are wearing deeper, more complicated eyeshadow downstairs), highlighting the inner corner (often done with liquid shadow or a pencil, this can be worn alone to brighten the eye, but also combined with a smoky eye to prevent the dark liner from "closing in" the eye).

When it comes to color, a wash usually has two purposes.

One, to brighten, adding light to open up the eye. This is best accomplished by fleshy color a shade lighter than your actual skin tone; ideally, you are aiming for an effect like candlelight on the skin, or even the slight sheen of oil on your skin. Consequently, much depends on your skin tone. I have light skin and look better in cooler shades, so I favor NARS All About Eve, which is a silvery champagne. But a pale, pale redhead might prefer a pearly moonstone, like Urban Decay Polyester Bride, while someone with chocolatey skin would look absolutely stunning in Shu Uemura ME Gold 390, and a blue-eyed or green-eyed blonde with medium skin might favor the classic that started it all, Stila Kitten. A matte shade will work here, but shimmer is better, because it attracts light. I think gold and silver are excellent choices here, but you want soft, soft shades so it doesn't look harsh (which would defeat the purpose), a dove grey instead of metallic silver, a gold tempered with beige. Gold and silver also look good mixed together. Everyone should own a fleshy highlight: not only will you use it often, it can also work as a general highlight on the face, as well as on the browbone and the inner corner.

Two, to contrast, either with your natural coloring (usually eye color, to emphasize it) or with some other eyecolor, either liner or crease or whatever. In this case, a you want colo