The scoop on all things stylish--from couture to ready-to-wear to handmade.

· Blog Home
· Profile


Google Custom Search

On This Page
· freddy&ma custom handbags
· Trends! Honestly...
· fantasy web find of the day: Anthropologie Weekend Getaway Bag $398
· Cheap Thrill!
· Chloé Paddington

Comments
· 2:02 AM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi
· 2:10 AM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi

Archives
TheBroadroom.Net's Fashion Blog (archive)
· April 2005
· May 2005
· June 2005
· July 2005
· August 2005
· September 2005
· October 2005
· November 2005
· December 2005
· January 2006
· February 2006
· March 2006
· April 2006
· May 2006
· June 2006
· July 2006
· August 2006
· September 2006
· October 2006
· November 2006
· December 2006
· January 2007
· February 2007
· March 2007
· April 2007
· May 2007
· June 2007



 
The Lipstick Page Forums Fashion Blog


freddy&ma custom handbags
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Monday, April 16, 2007 6:30 AM (Eastern)

freddy&ma custom handbags
freddy&ma custom handbags

freddy&ma custom handbags

This is not a press release (although they do have one). It's pure word-of-mouth, or word-of-Net these days; I got this link from another board.

thanx for making us look good
Gabrielle Union with freddy&ma handbag
image courtesy freddyandma.blogs.com

They do have a completely interactive bag-designing website...which I can admit I thought would be a bore. I'm not a bag person, I loathe all-Flash websites in the main, who needs to spend time designing a bag...et cetera.

When I got there I realized the bags were good. Started out with the fine intention of making a bag from each designer on the site...about six bags in, I realized this was not a good idea at 3 o'clock in the morning. So, the samples above are just from the first 8 designers.

They have solid colors too, will soon have more selection...all-leather bags and so forth. They have some special bags to benefit charitable causes. I will emphasize again that there are many other designers and their patterns, many ways of putting together "your" bag. You may email "your" bag to your friend for her to critique, as well.

Most intriguing of all, according to their press release, these bags are made in the U.S.A. I had to read that two or three times for it to sink in. There is not much about that fact on the freddy&ma site, which I think is a mistake. There is an enormous, not-talked-about-much sentiment for Americans to "buy American." Not just American designers (but thanks anyway), but especially American labor.

The price range is in the two to three hundreds, which admittedly is more than I pay for a bag; however, I will guess the quality of these bags is up there with the (far more expensive) imported designer bags.

I will leave you with a size description from the charming copy on the site:

Dims: 14.5" x 13" x 4.5"
Carries: new gossip rags, afternoon protein bar, new blouse you bought during your afternoon 'dentist appointment'


Enjoy!

Labels: , , , , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Trends! Honestly...
Posted by Dain, Wednesday, November 15, 2006 12:13 AM (Eastern)

I hate layering. You know, leggings, complicated dress, tunics, tailored jackets, whatever, all on top of each other. I don't care if you do it in neutrals. It looks stupid. I hate to see it whenever I flip through glossies (Lucky in particular reeks with too much layering. What is happening to this magazine? It's going downhill. Whatever happened to the Consumer's Digest of fashion? Now it's, vanity fair.). It's too multidimensionally significant. Too "interesting", rather than attractive. Clothes should look good, first and foremost.

The trends I prefer:
1. Dresses that are interesting, not readily identifiable, and fit to perfection... that, I think, is a trend to yield clothes that will last you a lifetime. Because really, when will you ever hate a beautiful dress? Yes, they're more expensive than tops, but the amount of real wear you get out of them is far greater. Might as well snap some up while it's the fashion to design beautiful, well made, and interesting clothes.
2. Pristine, well-cut basics. This, I think, is an emerging trend. One that hasn't really shown its face yet. It's time. Yeah, $300 jeans are ridiculous, but these trends filter down from the top. GAP makes precision cut jeans, Express makes editor pants... and now tees and shirts are getting the treatment. What next? Sweaters are coming. A mania for precise, handcrafted artisanal sweaters.

Things I'm not sure about:
1. Organic jewelry? But then, my taste is to the baroque. I don't know that I want gold and jewels to look as if they grew on me. And yet, to look at, they are, very pretty.
2. Really, I don't like the shoe trends. Architectural? Please. There are two shoes I'm contemplating this season, it's just that boring to me:
The Steve Madden 'Carmila': So classic that it's eternally tasteful. They're not Manolos, but they are surprisingly close to well made for factory chaff.

Doc Martens: I revere Christian Louboutin, but the ubiquity repels me. Before, Louboutin was something like a fledgling Roger Vivier without feathers (no pun intended). Now? It's like Louis Vuitton: common but expensive, beautifully made but still! common. (Is this elitist of me? Or fair to demand of an artist? Cobblers, presumably, artists.) I don't know, perhaps it is too much to say at once. All I know is a part of me is a little sick of seeing that red heel. The antidote? These.


I do, sometimes, just love Louboutin, though:
All the sex appeal of killer heels, but with the refinement of a tuxedo. It's a kind of joke, but one that you don't quite get until you really think about it, because the shoe looks so good on your foot (imagine it peeking forth from a simple skirt and cardigan combo).


What am I craving? Rich, rich, colors: just a little "off" from true colors. Both Fall 2006 and Spring 2007 are playing off very neutral palettes, so I want, actually, the most intense color I can find. I suppose the makeup trends are bright enough? E.g. Instead of cobalt blue, you have this quasi-violet-toned ultramarine, in lush suede:
This is Brian Atwood, Spring 2007.


One Big Trend: An Analysis
Neutral, neutral colored accessories, in rich skins (or plastic, as the case may be), a parade of shoes, and bags. Wear with sharp, tailored clothing:
Can you imagine this Calvin Klein python bag slung on your arm? *dies*

My god, I could not stop salivating when I saw these. Beige: boring. Crocodile: always grosses me out slightly. But together, so... rich. Perfection. Sculptures by Alexander McQueen.

Normally, I would not advocate Chanel, because I find it so tasteless, but the Naked Bag is such a self-referential, self-aware take on tacky-expensive that I actually find it very clever. It makes fun of itself.

A huge tote is something that always appeals to me, maybe because I always carry around so many books. Marni makes this one in patent leather (still going strong), black leather accents, and resin handles.

Smokey snakeskin, in classic, universally flattering and versatile styles. Just right with the LBD (Little Black Dress) and berry lipstick. Salvatore Ferragamo and Tods.

VBH's white leather with brown accents, such a chic combination. It's pristine, but not cloudlike and formless. But reinvented in a very modern slouchy, egg shape.


But...
Imagine the one slung on your arm as you step out into the night. Imagine the other as you jet off to someplace glamorous and sunny (sounds so good right now, in this dreary Connecticut November). Some things, come what will, will always be true to a signature look. In spite of trends. Which I respect. What is it that the Manolo says? "Pucci always makes the smiles."

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


2 comment(s)  
 
2:02 AM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

Hermmmmm...layers are like Uggs. I suppose. I never see Uggs around here, only read endless complaints about Uggs on the Net.

Uggs supposedly look like crap, they were at one point ubiquitous, everyone dissed them, yadda yadda...but from all reports, they're warm. They even keep your feet dry. This makes them interesting to me. Not here and now...my Doc Martens boots keep my feet warm and dry in our relatively mild climate...but the concept.

Now layers, you find in California. It's not a fashion. People have always worn layers here. You have to. The weather is crazy.

For example, this morning it was so cold I turned the heat on. (Okay this is California, you have to turn the heat on.) By afternoon, it was hot. Short sleeve hot. In the evening, it was back cold again.

Almost any time you wear clothes warm enough for the morning and evening, you have to have a creative way of shedding at least one layer of them in the afternoon. Whenever it looks hot outside, it can suddenly turn cold; you almost always have to have a wrap of some kind with you, and preferably some way of tying it so you don't have to carry it.

It was slightly worse in Washington because of the rain. It starts raining right out of the blue. So, add a waterproof layer to the fact that it's freezing there.

Layers for the sake of layers just strikes me as silly. If it's cold though, I always throw on another layer.

 
2:10 AM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

Ohhhhh...I know exactly what you mean about "not readily identifiable."

It's been in the back of my mind for some time...how, more and more so, we are buying all of our clothing at exactly the same stores. The same brands, the same models even.

I think the trend will be toward smaller designers, boutiques, people making their own clothes or starting their own cottage industries...in the same way the trend is toward esoteric perfume houses. Ultimately, people will want something different.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



fantasy web find of the day: Anthropologie Weekend Getaway Bag $398
Posted by Dain, Friday, June 02, 2006 11:50 AM (Eastern)


The picture doesn't do it justice, but isn't this carry-on bag from Anthropologie so gorgeous? It's a huge bag (so on trend) of pure supple white leather, with distressed chestnut leather accents. The white is so gorgeous, but the chestnut gives the bag enough substance to use all year round. It'll only improve with age. So simple, but so luxurious—for a huge leather bag, I think $398 is a good investment. Or maybe I'm just particularly enamoured of it because I myself am going on a trip soon.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Cheap Thrill!
Posted by Dain, Sunday, May 15, 2005 6:08 PM (Eastern)

I'm a hopeless bag snob, and 'tisn't necessarily label-wise, because I don't like, say, Longchamp (the ubiquitous nylon totes) or Louis Vuitton for the sake of LV (though I like the idea of monogrammed luggage). My current drool-over bag is the impossible-to-find, $1380 investment, the Chloé Paddington.

Imagine my surprise when I stumbled across the Africa Tote at the GAP. Originally $45 or so, it was on sale for $20. Dirt cheap. It's the right size, too, large enough to hold an Exacompta folder, but not unwieldy. Made of ivory canvas (there was a black, as well), with hardware, wood ring details, and an exotic-print interior.








Of course, the pale canvas will get dirty very soon. But I'm of the philosophy that bags are meant to get beat-up, from a $20 bag like this to a $5000 Hermès Birkin. They're like shoes, meant to be worn, meant to be used; they signify everyday life. It's a little preposterous to keep things pristine.

I'm just happy to have found the perfect casual bag, one I needn't worry needlessly about, with spot-on details, and a unique style.

Labels: , , , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Chloé Paddington
Posted by Dain, Tuesday, April 19, 2005 5:08 PM (Eastern)

Oh ladies, I've found it. THE bag, the one I'd wear all the time, use all the time, because it's gorgeous and versatile and matches everything else. Enter, the Chloé Paddington.



It's aged leather, with plenty of details (ID tag, padlock, buckles, key), just the right size, and the perfect slouchy shape that vacillates between all the extremes of my style with ease—adds a bit of the casual to a prim, ladylike outfit, and of course fits in perfectly with bohemian clothes. Usually I don't like fussy details when it comes to bags (I tend to prefer classic), but the Paddington has a certain fitness to it; it has balance. It comes in a variety of pretty colors, but I like the tan. It looks good against a black winter coat, and won't clash with my brown leather jacket the way the darker brown Paddington would. It's just the right size, too.

The bag is $1380, an investment, for sure, but it'd serve one well. It's also something of a cult bag, which tends to bother me, but I fell in love with it before I was ever aware of its "It" bag status, so there's no help for it. I was contemplating a tan Hermès Birkin prior to the advent of the Paddington, but this is much better. It's special, but versatile enough to become a basic for years to come.

Picture courtesy of www.chloe.com.

Labels: , , , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



  Blog
Recent blog posts:




Powered by Blogger