The scoop on all things stylish--from couture to ready-to-wear to handmade.

· Blog Home
· Profile


Google Custom Search

On This Page
· Handmade jewelry update
· freddy&ma custom handbags
· This is neat...
· It's been a day of...
· Pearl bracelet
· Year 2 of making jewelry
· Jewelry ramblings
· This and that
· What I've been up to lately...more handmade jewelry
· Handmade jewelry ramblings...
· On wearing your own jewelry
· Beading blog up!
· New blog in the works
· Jewelry making #20
· Jewelry making #19
· Jewelry making #18
· Jewelry making #17
· Jewelry making #16
· Jewelry making #15
· Jewelry making #14
· Jewelry making #13
· Jewelry making #12
· Jewelry making #11
· Jewelry making #10
· Jewelry making #9
· Jewelry making #8 and odd thoughts
· Knitting (and more thoughts)
· Jewelry making #7
· Jewelry making #6
· Jewelry making #5
· Jewelry making #4
· Jewelry making #3
· Jewelry making #2
· Making jewelry #1
· Making jewelry

Comments
· 4:34 PM by Blogger Dain
· 3:36 PM by Blogger Colleen Shirazi

Archives
TheBroadroom.Net's Fashion Blog (archive)
· April 2005
· May 2005
· June 2005
· July 2005
· August 2005
· September 2005
· October 2005
· November 2005
· December 2005
· January 2006
· February 2006
· March 2006
· April 2006
· May 2006
· June 2006
· July 2006
· August 2006
· September 2006
· October 2006
· November 2006
· December 2006
· January 2007
· February 2007
· March 2007
· April 2007
· May 2007
· June 2007



 
The Lipstick Page Forums Fashion Blog


Handmade jewelry update
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Monday, May 14, 2007 9:03 PM (Eastern)

Hmmm...what I wanted to do here, was wow you with expansive photos of fabulous jewelry, but, I'm way too tired. I'm slowly taking photos of the jewelry I've made that I want to keep. Here is my Picasa album:

handmade jewelry

Boss eh? I've just gotten into Picasa; it's not bad actually.

It takes forever to produce good jewelry. Unless you're smart enough to apprentice with someone who already knows how to make jewelry, preferably someone with all the equipment and materials...heh heh...keep dreaming.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



freddy&ma custom handbags
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Monday, April 16, 2007 6:30 AM (Eastern)

freddy&ma custom handbags
freddy&ma custom handbags

freddy&ma custom handbags

This is not a press release (although they do have one). It's pure word-of-mouth, or word-of-Net these days; I got this link from another board.

thanx for making us look good
Gabrielle Union with freddy&ma handbag
image courtesy freddyandma.blogs.com

They do have a completely interactive bag-designing website...which I can admit I thought would be a bore. I'm not a bag person, I loathe all-Flash websites in the main, who needs to spend time designing a bag...et cetera.

When I got there I realized the bags were good. Started out with the fine intention of making a bag from each designer on the site...about six bags in, I realized this was not a good idea at 3 o'clock in the morning. So, the samples above are just from the first 8 designers.

They have solid colors too, will soon have more selection...all-leather bags and so forth. They have some special bags to benefit charitable causes. I will emphasize again that there are many other designers and their patterns, many ways of putting together "your" bag. You may email "your" bag to your friend for her to critique, as well.

Most intriguing of all, according to their press release, these bags are made in the U.S.A. I had to read that two or three times for it to sink in. There is not much about that fact on the freddy&ma site, which I think is a mistake. There is an enormous, not-talked-about-much sentiment for Americans to "buy American." Not just American designers (but thanks anyway), but especially American labor.

The price range is in the two to three hundreds, which admittedly is more than I pay for a bag; however, I will guess the quality of these bags is up there with the (far more expensive) imported designer bags.

I will leave you with a size description from the charming copy on the site:

Dims: 14.5" x 13" x 4.5"
Carries: new gossip rags, afternoon protein bar, new blouse you bought during your afternoon 'dentist appointment'


Enjoy!

Labels: , , , , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



This is neat...
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Wednesday, March 28, 2007 1:17 AM (Eastern)

MixtGoods

What's neat is that it's all American artists and crafters. Off the top of my head, the only other sites I can think of that sell American made goods are the Sundance site and of course Etsy.

Labels: , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



It's been a day of...
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Saturday, February 10, 2007 5:46 PM (Eastern)

...extraordinarily bad photography.



I think you need natural light to do this sort of thing. It's been overcast and raining the past few days; I've concluded that a good photograph won't be possible until it clears up.

Anyhow. I feel I am slowly, but slowly, making the kind of jewelry I want to make. Did I mention slowly? It takes a long time to get the hang of it. I owe a lot to the forum at jewelrymaking.about.com. I've been there only a short time but the level of experience of the posters is phenomenal.

I had to restring the citrine necklace anyway, to add in the "wire thimbles":


image courtesy www.rings-things.com

So I shortened it some. I hated doing that, but it does have an extender chain clasp, so it can go two inches longer. A shorter necklace is more versatile.

The pieces are finished. Whenever possible, I've "double crimped" them (some designs don't look good that way, like the three-strand jade bracelet). That means using two crimps instead of one:


image courtesy www.artbeads.com

It's best to flatten both crimps, then fold them (not flatten and fold one, then do the other).

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Pearl bracelet
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:01 PM (Eastern)







Okay, I'm done with this piece.

If anything, I've learned a lot about the finer details of construction this month. It's relatively easy to make the piece itself. But after you've worn it for a while, you start to appreciate those hundreds of little touches, that were invisible to you before, that make it a piece that either breaks down after a while, or else lasts.

That is a hot topic over at the jewelrymaking.about.com forum. Of all the about.com sections I've visited, I'll have to say this is one of the best. It's constantly being updated, and has all sorts of tutorials and links.

So...in the previous incarnation of this bracelet, for example, the pearls were connected directly to the clasp. Not good; it's a terrific wear-and-tear spot. Solution: use not one, but two jump rings to connect pearl to clasp. In fact two jump rings can work in many stress points.

While I was doing this, I discovered a better way to snip the jump rings (you can and should use a saw for this but I don't have one). Simply hold the coil horizontally to make the cuts. Comes out straight every time.

Why a blue stone? It's a beautiful clasp, but I bought it for a turquoise piece, not this. But I tried it...it's just too perfect. The blue stone in real life is sky blue in color...it's Swiss Blue Topaz, not Sky Blue, but it's not that almost gaudy blue that you see in blue topaz. It's like the California sky on a good day.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Year 2 of making jewelry
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:20 PM (Eastern)

Okay technically year 2 began for me last September, but it'll be easier to document if I start the year now.


(This is the necklace on its shortest setting.)



I'm pretty pleased with this...the pearls are good quality and the overall look is dressy because of the black and clear Swarovski crystals.

Side note: are Swarovski crystals all that? I think they are. I've used Chinese crystals; some can actually be better than Swarovski's only because of the colors (I have some that are red, with this interesting yellow/orange edge, and some olive green ones), but I use Swarovski as my staple crystal.

I have enough pearls to make a matching bracelet. Here is the original bracelet (mind you, nothing in that picture exists anymore though I do plan to redo the pearl earrings):



The original necklace was similar, a plain strand of the pearls with small gold spacer beads.

Here is a double strand citrine necklace:





mumbles... I didn't even use a flash with this, I suppose the light was too bright.

The flower bead is quite nice; it's Indian sterling silver with a round faceted citrine on either side. The drop at the bottom is citrine of course.




Pink Swarovski crystal, vermeil Indian beads, on goldfilled chain. I did use a flash here and it caught one of the crystals.

Finally, some earrings:



I tried photographing them together and it didn't really work. These are good earrings...I've worn them all day and they don't get heavy. (Usually the only way to tell is by wearing them.) The pink pearls aren't that pink...they're a sort of faint peachy pink color, good lustre. The vermeil beads on the right-hand pair are Turkish.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Jewelry ramblings
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Friday, December 08, 2006 9:24 PM (Eastern)

I've finished my second phase of making jewelry.

It's a process remarkably similar to figuring out makeup and learning to use it well, rather than in a default or exaggerated manner. Oh, here it is: Minimalism? (philosophical makeup use).

It's not quite the same in that I think of phase one of jewelry making as a combination of "gee whiz, I can make my own jewelry?" and "it's incredibly difficult" (unless you have the good fortune to learn it from someone else). Because there are so many new materials and techniques, available locally or on the Net, you can be up and running with a relatively low initial investment. i.e. you need not invest in metalworking up front, only in a few key tools and some wire and stringing materials.

The difficulty I suppose varies. I'm not crafty; it was difficult for me.

Phase two is when you can make things, and make them well, but there is still a lot of experimentation. The variables, may I say, are akin to cosmetic variables. If you have tens of thousands of lipsticks, eyeshadows, and blushes from which to choose, so you have tens of thousands of beads, which can be strung, or knotted, or wire wrapped...you can make a necklace from a chain, or make it on a chain, or make your own chain, or skip the chain and go for a leather, or suede, or hemp, or stretch cord, or memory wire...choose a spring ring, lobster claw, box (drools), hook-and-eye, or S clasp...the common materials are sterling silver and gold fill, but now we have Argentium sterling silver (which is slowly becoming more widely available), which reputedly can't tarnish. Oh, and there's vermeil too. And don't forget the crystals. :)

Phase three is when you no longer wish to make casual pieces. Each piece now has to involve...something elevated. It can appear to be more expensive than phase two, but, overall, it's cheaper. Just as you spend less on makeup once you've figured it out, but (most likely) more on each item, so each piece of phase three jewelry can cost more than a phase two piece, but there are fewer pieces to begin with.

I've done three pieces of phase three jewelry so far. The first is a pair of freshwater pearl earrings. These were not extraordinarily difficult, in fact they consist of an egg-shaped pearl, a square pearl, and a large coin-shaped pearl: that's it. They are connected by simple loops, with a few small gold-filled beads thrown in.

They're horribly simple but then they are the MAC "Sophisto" lipstick of my nascent phase three jewelry collection. It probably took me more time picking out those six pearls than doing the design and assembling it. It was the pearls themselves that made these earrings (that, and a hankering I already had for square and coin-shaped pearls); they are of a faint peachy pink hue (not too peachy, nor too mauve), with intense lustre and good size.

I used gold-filled wire to do the loops, and "made" a bronze niobium wire for each (the wires are already bent except for the front loop, so you can add a small bead or wire coil of your choice before making the loop).

What's great: they show. I don't put my hair up often, and it's long enough to drown out many an earring.

They're sufficiently lightweight so that I can wear them all day without wanting to remove them.

The color goes with just about anything, because they're not distinctly pink or peach. In fact (to stretch the makeup analogy until it begs for mercy), not dissimilar to a blush...the blush that looks perfectly natural on you. Not too warm, not too cool.

I debated about making them fancier with, say, vermeil daisy spacer beads. But I think that would actually make them look more ordinary.

The second piece is a citrine bracelet, three strands: two consist of faceted citrine beads separated by Bali sterling daisy spacers, one of citrine "points" (these are like tiny smooth long teardrops) with a Bali bead for every seven points. These are held together not by spacer bars, but by large handmade sterling beads shaped like flowers with a round faceted citrine on either side of the bead. The clasp for this is the same citrine one pictured here: This and that. As much as I rather liked the original bangle, it hardly showed on me (much like, hm, MAC "Jubilee" lipstick...okay, I'll stop now).

The third piece is a matching citrine necklace, two strands: one of the same faceted beads and daisy spacers; the other, the same points and Bali beads. In front is a third flower-shaped bead, with a large smooth teardrop-shaped citrine bead hung below it.

I actually had all of the beads for both pieces, except that last teardrop-shaped one, and for weeks I'd been trying to come up with a design using them.

Citrine is one of my favorite stones (I tried making a list of my favorite stones and it became depressingly long), but its color is subtle and the trick is to use a lot of it when you're making a piece.

So what's next? I have a few odd things I'd like to do, like a three-strand peridot bracelet, a "keishi" pearl necklace (these are "cornflake" shaped pearls), a white square pearl necklace...I'm going to restring my dancing pearl necklace and bracelet (I'd like to add some crystals to both) and my American turquoise necklace and bracelet (here I'd like to use crystal "wheel" beads). I'll need some leather cord for stuff...and I'd like to do some crystal pieces for my daughter and myself (crystals with Argentium silver).

I'll have some pictures later on.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



This and that
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:10 PM (Eastern)



I can admit I never really liked cardigans until I saw the late Kurt Cobain wearing them.


image courtesy www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~tsuzy

Keep in mind that I lived outside Seattle when Cobain, and grunge, were very much alive. The climate in the Puget Sound Area more than justifies all aspects of grunge, from Doc Martens boots to flannel shirts to the cardigans to...anything that keeps you warm and dry, basically.

A cardigan need not be "grungy" of course, but it should fit the way you want it to. I like mine oversized and thick, if it's cotton. If it's wool, I prefer it more on the thin side.

I've been making more jewelry. Right now it's important, since I'll be going on a trip. Now, the jewelry has to work.



I made these today (when they're on, they hang straight of course). I got the idea from Target, believe or not. They had some earrings on sale that were made on a jig...they'd wrapped the top so that the top loop was still open and the tail of the wrap was tucked in the back.



Here is more stuff. The bracelet is citrine...I bent the clasp a bit so you could see it's also citrine. The earrings are citrine and gold-filled chain. Very hard to make because the chain is super fine (you can barely fit 24 gauge wire into it), but beautiful on, since they catch the light and glow golden.

I'm making a necklace to match the freshwater pearl bracelet, only it will have a slightly different clasp (onyx cabochon rather than faceted onyx). The pearl necklace will be single strand.

The pearl earrings were my first expedition into chain.



Finally, a really odd necklace. Even I'm not sure what to make of it. Thing is, the colors of this piece are divine. The tiny beads are Japanese, a blend of wine-red, clear light purple, clear light pink, a sort of bronzy red, clear beads lined with pink or purple. I threw in some lampwork beads I had sitting around...a yummy red Chinese pair with pink flowers, and then the big burgundy-colored one. If it were any heavier, I wouldn't wear it. But somehow I like this piece.

If you look closely, you'll see I've run out of several key components. I have them on order so I can finish it all before the trip.


, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , , ,


2 comment(s)  
 
4:34 PM, Blogger Dain said...

Wow, those look great. Fun hobby. : )

 
3:36 PM, Blogger Colleen Shirazi said...

It is a lot of fun...and it's good for you. I think mainly because you have to be extraordinarily patient, which I'm not normally...then there is the design aspect, because you have to create from scratch (I've used only a few "readymade" designs).

Then there is the materials aspect, because you have to figure out what to use and where to buy it from.

I'll have to say it's cheaper in the long run than buying jewelry. There's a big investment of time, and some money, up front, but once you find your groove, you're pretty much set.

Say...let's switch the comment email back to the old email. I still have it open, it would be handier for this kind of thing.

 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



What I've been up to lately...more handmade jewelry
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Wednesday, August 30, 2006 1:33 PM (Eastern)

I think...I am finally producing final pieces that are more than just your string o' beads.

It's harder than it looks. Not the technical part, because that requires only practice. It's more the notion of being able to step into a bead store with hundreds of kinds of beads and materials, and from there produce a finished piece.

The earrings on the left are labradorite paired with quartz crystals. The necklace and the other earrings are jade, paired with, respectively, quartz crystals and freshwater pearls.

I still need to make a third pair of earrings, conforming to my theory that each necklace needs three pairs of earrings to go with it. The third pair will have to be simpler but I haven't decided yet which style.


, , ,

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Handmade jewelry ramblings...
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Wednesday, August 09, 2006 11:49 AM (Eastern)

I haven't rambled much here about my jewelry-making expedition lately, since it fits so much more neatly here. Yet it does figure largely into what I wear these days, so I don't mind venturing a post or two over here now and again.

Mind you this is Phase One of jewelry fabrication; it's a case of "Darling, I have no money." I've not been able to invest in classes, nor (yet) in metal work or making your own beads out of glass (which has got to be the height of coolness). It's okay. There is a fairly stunning array of effects you can get working with wire, and even Softflex and stretch cord. There will come a point when I've exhausted the techniques I have now, I know it, it doesn't bother me. By then who knows?

Today it's hot again. The climate here is next to bizarre anyway, it'll start out "leather jacket cold" and somehow morph into "tank top hot" sometime during the day. At night again it's freezing. But today, as I say, it's going to be hot. The morning already breathes differently and I'm planning on wearing something tank-top-ish.

It's the ideal outfit for handmade jewelry, since you're talking minimal cloth and a swooping neckline. In fact, a semi-precious stone necklace (provided it has sufficient stones) can make a tank top appear more modest; I've done that.

What to wear? I have a small set of necklaces I actually consider finished, and about ten times as many that I don't. Hum. On second thought (after putting on a deep grey tank top and pale sea blue "boybeater" over that), sometimes you don't need a necklace. Depends on the earrings.

I have some on now my daughter designed; she has a more acute sense of color than I do. She put together cobalt-blue cloisonne beads...with a pattern of pinky orange flowers and green leaves on a brown bough on them...with teal green glass flower beads. Sounds horrible on paper, but it works, down to the teal green "popping" my green eyes and the large, fan-shaped cloisonne beads providing an intense burst of blue, tempered by the salmon-pink flowers...and cloisonne is an excellent choice for earrings btw, because it's lightweight. You can make sizable cloisonne earrings and the earrings float on your lobes all day.

Oh well that's enough rambling...carry on, fashionistas!


, , ,

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



On wearing your own jewelry
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Friday, July 21, 2006 1:47 AM (Eastern)

It is kind of weird. I've been wearing some of my pieces (some pics are in the Image Library's fashion gallery, but keep in mind some of the pieces pictured have already been redone). It is very different from wearing jewelry that you bought readymade. It is a bit closer to wearing jewelry that you inherited...that's so old it's unlikely that too many similar pieces are floating around. But handmade jewelry is, by definition, unique. Once you get some skill going--even if you don't feel your skill is there yet--you can create entirely "you" jewelry...that's based on an outfit, or a whim, or something you admired, or something you've been looking for, for years.

Almost a year ago I was bemoaning the fact that I couldn't seem to find nice green earrings (More jewelry thoughts...). i.e. I could not easily find a nice pair of earrings with green stones that I could just buy and be happy with. Now, I have a beautiful string of jade beads at home, with two sets of jade briolettes just waiting to be made into earrings. The price for the entire jade suite is less than I would have paid for a single pair of jade earrings, had I been able to find them back then. And of course I'll have enough jade beads left to do something else with.

Today I wore my quartz crystal earrings--pictured here (the diamond shapes):



...and they were quite amazingly perfect. They don't look like much in the picture, but the clear crystal just grabs the light and floats inside the diamond-shaped silver frame. The engineering took me a while (I bent the frames slightly to make them look more handmade, actually)...and I added jump rings to make the crystal strand move better (the model for the design is here: Runway Earrings Jewelry Making Project; as you can see there wasn't a center strand in the original). Along with this I wore the rose quartz and garnet necklace in the same pic. Again, the idea of making clear crystal earrings was to have a pair of earrings that would literally go with anything.


, , , ,

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Beading blog up!
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Thursday, November 03, 2005 2:07 PM (Eastern)

Okay, that was easier than I thought it would be.

Beading Blog - thebroadroom.net.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



New blog in the works
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, 1:02 PM (Eastern)

I've decided to make a separate blog for my beading exploits. For one thing, I can see that I have enough material to justify having a separate blog. For another, this is after all the Fashion Blog; I don't want it completely dominated by posts of only one type. It should roundly cover fashion-related topics.

It will probably take me a few days to get the new blog set up, as it will feature our new Javascript "Code That" menu, the new page template, yadda yadda... The blog will appear on TheBroadroom.Net site rather than this site, The Lipstick Page Forums.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Jewelry making #20
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Saturday, October 29, 2005 12:58 PM (Eastern)

Well, that is the part that's stunning about even simple jewelry making. Once you've figured out what you want to use, and played around with it enough to feel comfortable stretching the piece, getting the drape right, choosing the findings, knotting, yadda yadda...you can now make anything you want.

I'm now wearing my 24" necklace. It's too long with what I'm wearing...I designed it specifically to work with turtlenecks. But, so what? I could just as easily make myself a 22" one or an 18" one. Or I could make this into an even longer one and double it. Or I could make the same pattern into a two-strand necklace. If I end up not wearing the 24" one, I could dismantle it. shrugs

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Jewelry making #19
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, 1:19 AM (Eastern)

Heh heh...so I'm waiting for the glue to "cure." I think it should set overnight before you pull on it too much. Gluing a bead in the back though, it is in a place that doesn't get too much direct stress.

This 24" piece is constructed of two of my favorite colors...deep red and blue-grey. The deep red is key. In this one, it's the color of cheap red wine...deep but clear rather than the smoky tinge of, ah, good red wine.

The blue-grey beads if you look at them closely, seem to have swirls of the blue-grey on the outer layer of the bead. I tried scratching them to see if the color would come off, but I don't think it comes off.

These are accented with a few clear small round beads, that's it.

What I'm trying to do...and people who know me from the beauty forums will recognize this behavior...is try to build a sort of jewelry wardrobe. By this I mean, more pieces, for me, is not better. I heartily dislike clutter, programming is all about clutter and reducing it to something manageable, so what I am after is always the fewest variables, but not so few as to make more work.

So I had to have a deep red piece and something with grey in it, and a turquoise piece. I'm actually eyeing a bracelet I made for my daughter. lol! This is comprised of the blue-grey beads (round), plus some similarly colored beads (these are less grey, a tad more blue) that look like raindrops...not the familiar tear-shaped ones, but raindrops sitting, say, on the deck. And then some truly beautiful beads that have blue and a sort of gold/brown thing in them. This is in, not a symmetrical pattern, but rather a repeating pattern, so you end up with a raindrop next to a round blue-grey bead where you were expecting two identical beads. That's the part I like best.

It's the eccentricity of these three pieces.... But I have a pile of stuff that I need to restring. One is this cool, red, Chinese thing...I have two of them actually.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Jewelry making #18
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Friday, October 28, 2005 9:03 PM (Eastern)

I'm trying out a long piece today...it's a full 24". I put a small metal bead in the back to stash the knot inside...why knot in the first place? I made this piece on Stretch Magic so that my daughter could wear it too.

This time it was easier gluing the knot inside the "cover bead." It's still something of a two-man job since, once you get the Hypo Cement going, it wants to keep going, and you have to jack the very fine wire-cap back into the applicator (with glue beading out and the piece you're working on in your hand). This time I just put a big drop of glue on the knot and then put it inside the bead, rather than trying to squeeze the glue into the bead-hole (which in theory would be possible, but as I say, the glue keeps on coming out, it is hardly worth it).

Well let's see how it goes. My 18" turquoise necklace wasn't long enough to wear with a turtleneck sweater, and I didn't feel like making a longer one of the same type. I do however have a turquoise-chip choker that I got a long time ago and never ended up wearing, so I have it in mind to cut it and use the chips for something else.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Jewelry making #17
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, 12:39 PM (Eastern)

My son is so cute. He asks me now every day, "So what did we learn in jewelry making today?"

Putting it that way, you do learn something new each time. I have seven finished bracelets now and one finished necklace. I know that doesn't sound like much...I have easily ten finished designs for necklaces...but they need to be restrung. i.e. I can still be considered to be in the materials phase.

I'm testing out my turquoise necklace now by wearing it, obviously, but also by putting it in my pocket and bending it around and doing the stuff that I myself do to my own jewelry.

Anyhow...here's my advice so far.

Don't bother with the 7 strand beading wire, unless you are deliberately looking for the lowest "break point." The 19 strand wire is much better. The 49 strand wire is even better, but it costs too much.

I checked this out on the Beadalon site...more strands = more flexible, less prone to kinking.

As far as the thickness (a different factor from the # of strands), that depends on which beads you're using. 0.18" is pretty thick if you're closing off your piece the Beadalon way (i.e. you thread the excess wire inside the first bead and then cut it flush). I made it fly with the turquoise piece, which uses small round smoky glass beads, but it was snug. I doubt it would work with anything smaller than that.

Crimp beads work better than crimp tubes for straightforward, beads-on-a-string necklaces and bracelets. They crimp much more easily, they're smaller and neater.

The tubes are kind of neat if you're looking to finish off 1.0 mm Stretch Magic ends, but I will try out the crimp beads next time and see how that works.

The 1.0 mm Stretch Magic is quite a bit less stretchy than the 0.7 mm. Its sole virtue is that you can use crimps with it. I actually tried some crimps on the 0.7 mm and the piece snapped neatly in two where the crimps were, so there is something to it.

On a more personal note...I have reached the "it factor" now. "It" is being able to make the jewelry that you've been looking for. Of course "it" is going to be different for each person...and I can't make all of "it" myself. For example, I have this cool Thai-style carved silver bracelet with a little garnet cabochon in it. It's not worth it for me to learn how to make this...it's perfect, yet it's something I can buy in a shop for twenty bucks. I doubt I could learn how to produce such pieces for less money than that.

The beads though... There is the predictable ability to combine colors, materials, textures, and even symbols, but what I've found more intriguing is the notion of capturing light. :)

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Jewelry making #16
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Wednesday, October 26, 2005 10:38 PM (Eastern)

Now it's getting good...finally....

I have only a few kinks to knock out of the system now. One is that, with my new crimping pliers, it seems that the #2 size crimps I have are too large to work with my beading wire. I mean it says on the face of the beading wire which size crimps to use. But if you're squashing your crimps with regular pliers, it hardly matters what size the crimps are, right? It all squashes down the same.

Still, I tried it out with the #2 crimps. It didn't work in the classical, crimping-pliers way in that I had to first crimp, then press into a round shape, then squash the round shape with the very ends of the crimping pliers. The first time I did it, it didn't work. The crimp shot right out when I tried pulling it with the pliers (which I always do).

The second time though...it seems fine. I put a set of 2 crimps on either side of the wire to make it stronger.

A couple of tips I got while surfing around...one is to coil your necklace one and one-half times, before closing the end. The idea is to get just enough slack to make a nice drape. (This is for non-stretch pieces of course.)

I tried this; it works great.

Two is for stretch elastic pieces. You are to get a bead that has a hole that's big enough to stash the knot inside the bead. You are to glue the knot inside that bead, using Hypo Cement.

I tried this also; it works great as well, but it's messier than what I'd thought. The glue in my Hypo Cement, once I got the wire-cap off, kept coming out even though I wasn't squeezing it. Bleh. I managed to get a good glob of HC on the knot and got the knot inside the bead. I let it set some, but while the cement was still "uncured" I went ahead and cleaned the cement that had gotten on the beads either side of the "cover bead," and some of it that had gotten on the elastic cord. If you clean up the piece before the glue gets hard, it's not too difficult to do.

Three...someone had an idea for Stretch Magic bracelets. It involved stringing the beads, then taking the two loose ends and drawing them through a bead. She then closed the loose ends with a crimp.

This looked beautiful but I wasn't 100% happy with it, because my kids would take apart such a piece the first day. i.e. one good pull on the finishing bead knocked the crimp right off.

However, I was happy modifying this idea. I knotted the ends first, using my usual square knot followed by an overhand knot.

I then took the loose ends and passed them through my bead (this is a bit tricky since it's 1.0 size Stretch Magic that works with crimps...you have to find a nice bead with a big enough hole to pass two lengths of 1.0 through), and knotted again. Here it sort of depends on the bead you're using.

For a cylindrical glass bead, I passed the two ends through it, then took a 10/0 seed bead and passed one of the ends through that. Without the seed bead, the knots at the bottom of the cylindrical bead would go right through the bead with one good pull.

I then knotted again, square knot plus overhand knot, then finished off with a gold crimp and trimmed the ends flush.

Here all of the stress of the bracelet goes to the first set of knots. If anyone pulls on the cylindrical bead, the stress then goes to the seed bead + set of knots of the bottom part of the bead. The crimp doesn't do anything, it just looks nicer than cut ends of elastic cord.

So...that's what I've discovered so far. Right now I'm wearing my first semi-precious piece...it's oval shaped turquoise beads, paired with small smoky glass beads. Why the glass beads, well, I figured anyone could make a straightforward string of turquoise beads. Why not make it more special? It's quite beautiful. I was going to make it longer, and ran out of turquoise beads (you can jack the length around a bit by placing a few more glass beads in the back), but now I think it's quite perfect, because it's light in weight.

This piece joins my finished glass bracelets...heh heh...secretly I'm thinking of never selling the jewelry, because there is something divine about wearing your own jewelry, that you designed, you figured out the materials and the sources, you came up with something out of nothing. Well I keep telling myself that these are samples. i.e. I can wear them, and just make the pieces to order. In any case I do intend to thoroughly wear-test everything before it goes on the market. If it's not perfect then I'll make it perfect before it goes on sale.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Jewelry making #15
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Monday, October 24, 2005 8:47 PM (Eastern)

Ah....

I'm using 1.0 mm Stretch Magic now on some pieces...and I am now, after what, two months? starting to produce finished pieces.

The 1.0 mm SM is quite a bit thicker than the 0.7 mm one. It can still string size 10/0 seed beads though.

1.0 also holds knots much better. It's less stretchy too, so it's tricky getting the piece loose enough (the right "drape").

I have three pieces done now...one uses "cane beads" combined with the purple and gold beads mentioned earlier, one is an old design...mostly clear glass "e beads" (I'm finally getting the terms right!), and one is brand new, it's different shades of blue and blue-grey.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Jewelry making #14
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, 1:43 PM (Eastern)

Okay, I'm a convert. I finally got one of those crimping pliers. All this time, I'd been working largely with the Stretch Magic, however, I started using it in the first place because I was making children's designs. It's much easier for children to put on and take off pieces made with stretch elastic. Plus, elastic or string breaks when stretched too far, which is what you want for children.

All of that said, I've been impressed that it is quite easy to make beaded pieces sophisticated enough for adults. You need only find a good bead shop. A chain like Michael's is a good place to start but there's no way you'll be able to find everything you need there. A small-business bead shop can order the stuff that you need, plus most of the stuff is by the piece rather than packaged, so you can choose exactly what you need (and you won't get stuck with the odd dud beads that "make their way" into packages).

About the crimping pliers...if you're using crimps at all, buy yourself a pair. It's around $13 and it pays for itself the first time that you use it.

Hm. I've found the design part of jewelry making, to be almost too easy. It's the technical part...figuring out how to finish off the pieces, getting the tension just right, figuring out the materials...that is eating up most of the time I've spent since I started. I'm now thinking it takes two or three months to boil it down to perfection. I never intended to produce just a few pieces and leave it at that. From the beginning, I've thought of it as a business. Not a business in the sense of cutting costs to the bone and cranking out multitudes of pieces--because big companies can do that better than I can. But a business in me developing pieces that I like, and seeing if I can sell them.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Jewelry making #13
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Wednesday, October 19, 2005 10:55 PM (Eastern)

Okay...I've boiled it down to one new design, at most, per day. That does not mean one finished new design per day. It takes at least the rest of the day to simply wear the piece.

Version 1.1 of my green piece failed the wear test. I tried it out with 2 large oval sea-green Indian glass beads in front. It looked great but the oval beads were too heavy. They felt fine at first, but after wearing it for, say, six hours, the beads started to feel too heavy. So the oval glass beads are out.

I tried it again today...using various green beads in front. I tried out some nice square cloisonne beads, some oval (genuine) turquoise beads, the green glass leaf beads, eh...what I ended up with, were two of the sea-green Indian beads, but smaller round ones. I'm wearing it right now.

If I like it well enough, I will probably make a blue version...and maybe a lavender version.

Labels: , , , ,


0 comment(s)  
 
Post a comment (NO SPAM) Permalink . del.icio.us . Stumble



Jewelry making #12
Posted by Colleen Shirazi, Tuesday, October 18, 2005 8:53 PM (Eastern)

Heh heh...verrrrrrry interesting.

I'm in the test-drive stage now...and it is interesting. Pretty much as I'd expected, what looks good sitting on your dresser, does not necessarily work the same way "on."

I've already taken apart my two green necklace designs. And, I have worked out a way to do the back. That's actually quite key. It is the front and the back that make the necklace, but you never think about the back until you start wearing the pieces.

I'm trying out a few things actually...one thing that irritates me about wearing a necklace with a center, is constantly having to adjust the dang thing. I don't mind if it's a little bit off-center but I hate having the center part migrate too much to the side.

Likewise, I hate necklaces that slide backwards. So in both cases, the weight distribution is important.

I have some ideas for designs...I'm thinking, ten to twenty designs at the most. Or, if there are more, then they're going to emerge over time. It takes days to produce a single design that I'm happy with. Once it's done, obviously, then it can be replicated infinitely.

Labels: , ,