<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:04:41 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>The Lipstick Page Forums Fashion Blog</title><description></description><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/</link><managingEditor>TheLipstickPageForums.com</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>15</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116906800223776943</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-01-17T16:06:42.239-05:00</atom:updated><title>This blog has moved.</title><atom:summary type='text'>The Lipstick Page Forums Fashion Blog

Please update any bookmarks.</atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2007/01/this-blog-has-moved.html</link><author>TheLipstickPageForums.com</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116838576825052393</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-01-09T18:58:41.313-05:00</atom:updated><title>MICHAEL Michael Kors Milan</title><atom:summary type='text'>
I'm thinking about this for the summer. It is the perfect sultry shoe to wear with breezy dresses, no?</atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2007/01/michael-michael-kors-milan.html</link><author>dain.choi@yale.edu (Dain)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116789267132260504</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-01-04T01:37:51.333-05:00</atom:updated><title>Want to look at something interesting?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Seaplane</atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2007/01/want-to-look-at-something-interesting.html</link><author>Colleen Shirazi</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116777338380533783</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-01-02T17:15:09.506-05:00</atom:updated><title>Year 2 of making jewelry</title><atom:summary type='text'>Okay technically year 2 began for me last September, but it'll be easier to document if I start the year now.


(This is the necklace on its shortest setting.)



I'm pretty pleased with this...the pearls are good quality and the overall look is dressy because of the black and clear Swarovski crystals.

Side note: are Swarovski crystals all that? I think they are. I've used Chinese crystals; some</atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2007/01/year-2-of-making-jewelry.html</link><author>Colleen Shirazi</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116633356220891272</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-12-18T13:35:10.536-05:00</atom:updated><title>More jewelry ramblings...</title><atom:summary type='text'>It's Colleen btw. I switched my Blogger account to the beta version...mumbles...on the premise that the new Blogger features "labels." This is a feature that other blogging programs already have; at the least, it means we can categorize our posts (under, say, "Chanel," "grunge," "ramblings" etc.); same post may contain multiple labels. Ideally it would also mean our labels would be keywords, </atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2006/12/more-jewelry-ramblings.html</link><author>TheLipstickPageForums.com</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116630484045844657</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-12-17T02:20:24.686-05:00</atom:updated><title>Resort: Part 4</title><atom:summary type='text'>Throw it on for warmth
Daryl K-189 Jacket: In my mind, I saw a boxy black jacket, no embellishments whatsoever, very 80s prep school, worn casually with the sleeves rolled up. You have no idea how difficult it was to find one. Plain doesn't sell these days, apparently. But this one is perfect. All the lines (collar, shoulders, pockets, hem) are soft and curvy... sneakily feminine.

Swim!
Mmm... </atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2006/12/resort-part-4.html</link><author>dain.choi@yale.edu (Dain)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116568656126169694</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-12-09T12:49:21.273-05:00</atom:updated><title>Resort: Part 3</title><atom:summary type='text'>Accessories?

On such a simple palette of clothes, it's tempting to throw on as many accessories as possible. What wouldn't work? I like these basic clothes, as a sort of palette cleanser, but it really lets you showcase your personality in terms of accessories. 

For example, simple and earthy: A wooden bracelet, sleek leather sandals, and gold hoop earrings. 

But I am going to take my cue from</atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2006/12/resort-part-3_09.html</link><author>dain.choi@yale.edu (Dain)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116563184390170456</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 02:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-12-08T22:39:37.633-05:00</atom:updated><title>Jewelry ramblings</title><atom:summary type='text'>I've finished my second phase of making jewelry.

It's a process remarkably similar to figuring out makeup and learning to use it well, rather than in a default or exaggerated manner. Oh, here it is: Minimalism? (philosophical makeup use).

It's not quite the same in that I think of phase one of jewelry making as a combination of "gee whiz, I can make my own jewelry?" and "it's incredibly </atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2006/12/jewelry-ramblings.html</link><author>Colleen Shirazi</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116554552720608557</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-12-08T00:49:52.223-05:00</atom:updated><title>Resort: Part 2</title><atom:summary type='text'>Softest shirts...

1. Weekend
James Perse Mini Jersey Jewel-Neck Tee: Purist. A simple tissue-thin tee, in a vibrant shade. Why wear white?

2. Day
Derek Lam High Neck Ruffle Blouse: Romantic. A frilly shirt in a gothic color: rich powdery grape silk. Add classic pumps, maybe even animal print.

3. Night
Anthropologie Vivi V-Neck: Sultry. The shade is subdued, but nothing else about this shirt is</atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2006/12/resort-part-2.html</link><author>dain.choi@yale.edu (Dain)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116458726447790189</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-11-26T19:27:44.476-05:00</atom:updated><title>Addendum...</title><atom:summary type='text'>I actually have nothing against coke and coke addicts. But I think the cult of personality that has accumulated around Kate Moss is starting to... it's ridiculous. Rescind my membership to the Kate Moss fan club.</atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2006/11/addendum.html</link><author>dain.choi@yale.edu (Dain)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116458616886820581</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-11-26T19:09:29.006-05:00</atom:updated><title>Now, I thought Kate Moss was a fashion icon too...</title><atom:summary type='text'>But this is ridiculous. I don't care if she's too cool to "give a fuck", I don't care if this is "fashion"... this is some tiny, coked out woman jumping around with her top off. That is not an intelligent lifestyle choice. 

What are we celebrating here? Ignorance? Lack of conscience? Cool.

And as for her being a style setter? For God's sake, she's responsible for SKINNY jeans, wellies as </atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2006/11/now-i-thought-kate-moss-was-fashion.html</link><author>dain.choi@yale.edu (Dain)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116452746714739070</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-11-26T02:51:07.160-05:00</atom:updated><title>Disgusted.</title><atom:summary type='text'>I got the 90th anniversary issue of British Vogue today. $9.99. It is a waste of money. A rushed pictoral history, it looks like someone sat down and ate an archive and vomit all over the pages. WORST: the editorial "Magical History Tour". Combines two most nauseating trends at present: fashion looking back on itself (self-referential tailoring is getting out of hand) and, and... layering. With </atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2006/11/disgusted.html</link><author>dain.choi@yale.edu (Dain)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116443508150463950</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-11-25T01:11:51.023-05:00</atom:updated><title>Resort: Part 1</title><atom:summary type='text'>I'm craving a bit of an updatelooking forward to spring (yes, already!). Would that I were going to some place peaceful and warm. But sometimes a little commodity fetishism (it must be admitted) is just the ticket out, albeit a virtual one. For that matter, these clothes are virtual.

The formal perfection of Grace Kelly.

The inspiration for this look.

How to dress around a beige (the color for</atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2006/11/resort-part-1.html</link><author>dain.choi@yale.edu (Dain)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116398593605069325</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-11-19T20:30:51.510-05:00</atom:updated><title>Thanksgiving...</title><atom:summary type='text'>It's vacation, and I'm gonna be working very hard, so I will not see y'all till the end of the week. (Save November's Beauty Scrapbook.) So I leave you with this to ponder, speaking of exquisite dresses. These two are from Alexander McQueen, I think FALL 2006. Happy Thanksgiving!

Alexander McQueen Embroidered Tulle Gown $8,280
How unbelievably and heartbreakingly beautiful is this? Gothic </atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2006/11/thanksgiving.html</link><author>dain.choi@yale.edu (Dain)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/12268001/posts/summary/116357234282273458</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 05:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-11-15T04:30:00.293-05:00</atom:updated><title>Trends! Honestly...</title><atom:summary type='text'>I hate layering. You know, leggings, complicated dress, tunics, tailored jackets, whatever, all on top of each other. I don't care if you do it in neutrals. It looks stupid. I hate to see it whenever I flip through glossies (Lucky in particular reeks with too much layering. What is happening to this magazine? It's going downhill. Whatever happened to the Consumer's Digest of fashion? Now it's, </atom:summary><link>http://thebroadroom.net/lp/fashion/blogs/2006/11/trends-honestly.html</link><author>dain.choi@yale.edu (Dain)</author></item></channel></rss>